Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Symposium on rationality and commitment: introduction

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Peter, Fabienne and Schmid, Hans Bernard. (2005) Symposium on rationality and commitment: introduction. Economics and Philosophy, Vol.21 (No.1). pp. 1-3. ISSN 0266-2671

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Peter_Symposium_rationality.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (62Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266267104000343

Abstract

In his critique of rational choice theory, Amartya Sen claims that committed agents do not (or not exclusively) pursue their own goals. This claim appears to be nonsensical since even strongly heteronomous or altruistic agents cannot pursue other people's goals without making them their own. It seems that self-goal choice is constitutive of any kind of agency. In this paper, Sen's radical claim is defended. It is argued that the objection raised against Sen's claim holds only with respect to individual goals. Not all goals, however, are individual goals; there are shared goals, too. Shared goals are irreducible to individual goals, as the argument from we-derivativeness and the argument from normativity show. It is further claimed that an adequate account of committed action defies both internalism and externalism about practical reason.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Sen, Amartya, 1933-. Rational fools, Rational choice theory, Choice (Psychology), Decision making -- Moral and ethical aspects, Motivation (Psychology)
Journal or Publication Title: Economics and Philosophy
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 0266-2671
Date: April 2005
Volume: Vol.21
Number: No.1
Page Range: pp. 1-3
Identification Number: 10.1017/S0266267104000343
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung [Swiss National Science Foundation] (SNSF), International Students' Committee Foundation (ISCF), Universität St. Gallen (USG)
References: Anderson, E. 2001. Unstrapping the straightjacket of preferences. Economics and Philosophy 17: 21–38. Sen, Amartya. 1977. Rational fools: a critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6: 317–44. Sen, Amartya. [1985] 2002. Goals, commitment, and identity. In Amartya Sen, Rationality and freedom. Harvard University Press: 206–24.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/724

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us