Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Off-lattice noise reduced diffusion-limited aggregation in three dimensions

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Bowler, Neill E. and Ball, R. C.. (2005) Off-lattice noise reduced diffusion-limited aggregation in three dimensions. Physical Review E, Vol.71 (No.1). ISSN 1063-651X

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Ball_Off_lattice_noise.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (328Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.011403

Abstract

Using off-lattice noise reduction, it is possible to estimate the asymptotic properties of diffusion-limited aggregation clusters grown in three dimensions with greater accuracy than would otherwise be possible. The fractal dimension of these aggregates is found to be 2.50 +/- 0.01, in agreement with earlier studies, and the asymptotic value of the relative penetration depth is xi/R-dep = 0.122 +/- 0.002. The multipole powers of the growth measure also exhibit universal asymptotes. The fixed point noise reduction is estimated to be epsilon(f) similar to0.0035, meaning that large clusters can be identified with a low noise regime. The slowest correction to scaling exponents are measured for a number of properties of the clusters, and the exponent for the relative penetration depth and quadrupole moment are found to be significantly different from each other. The relative penetration depth exhibits the slowest correction to scaling of all quantities, which is consistent with a theoretical result derived in two dimensions. We also note fast corrections to scaling, whose limited relevance is consistent with the requirement that clusters grow far enough in radius to support sufficient scales of ramification.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QC Physics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Physics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Aggregation (Chemistry) -- Mathematical models, Fractals, Diffusion
Journal or Publication Title: Physical Review E
Publisher: American Physical Society
ISSN: 1063-651X
Date: January 2005
Volume: Vol.71
Number: No.1
Number of Pages: 7
Identification Number: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.011403
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: [1] T. A. Witten and L. M. Sander, Physical Review Letters 47, 1400 (1981). [2] R. M. Brady and R. C. Ball, Nature 309, 225 (1984). [3] H. Fujikawa and M. Matsushita, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 58 No. 11, 3875 (1989). [4] J. S. Langer, Reviews of Modern Physics 52 No. 1, 1 (1980). [5] J. Nittmann, G. Daccord, and H. E. Stanley, Nature 314, 141 (1985). [6] B. B. Mandelbrot, Physica A 191, 95 (1992). [7] E. Somfai, L. M. Sander, and R. C. Ball, Physical Review Letters 83 No. 26, 5523 (1999). [8] C. Tang, Physical Review A 31 No. 3, 1977 (1985). [9] R. C. Ball, Physica A 140, 62 (1985). [10] P.W. Barker and R. C. Ball, Physical Review A 42, 6289 (1990). [11] M. B. Hastings and L. S. Levitov, Physica D 116, 244 (1998). [12] R. C. Ball, N. E. Bowler, L. M. Sander, and E. Somfai, Physical Review E 66, 026109 (2002). [13] S. Tolman and P. Meakin, Physical Review A 40 No. 1, 428 (1989). [14] P. Meakin, Physical Review A 27 No. 3, 1495 (1983). [15] P. Meakin, Physical Review A 27 No. 1, 604 (1983). [16] L. M. Sander, Z. M. Cheng, and R. Richter, Physical Review B 28 No. 11, 6394 (1983). [17] R. Gagne and H. Kroger, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 7 No. 1, 125 (1996). [18] S. Schwarzer, S. Havlin, and H. E. Stanley, Physica A 191, 117 (1992). [19] S. Schwarzer, M. Wolf, S. Havlin, P. Meakin, and H. E. Stanley, Physcial Review A 46 No. 6, R3016 (1992). [20] B. Davidovitch, M. H. Jensen, A. Levermann, J. Mathiesen, and I. Procaccia, Physical Review Letters 86 No. 16, 164101 (2001). [21] M. T. Batchelor and B. I. Henry, Physica A 233, 905 (1996). [22] A. Vespignani and L. Pietronero, Physica A 173 No. 1-2, 1 (1991). [23] R. C. Ball and R. M. Brady, Journal of Physics A 18, L809 (1985). [24] N. E. Bowler, Ph.D. thesis, Warwick University (2001). [25] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (second edition) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1975). [26] K. K. M. Tokuyama, Physics Letters A 100 No. 7, 337 (1984). [27] N. R. Goold, R. C. Ball, and E. Somfai, New simulations of diffusion controlled growth, poster presented at Institute of Physics, Condensed Matter and Materials Conference, University of Warwick, April 2004.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/7293

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us