The Library
Developing a speciality: regearing the specialist public health workforce
Tools
Tools
Tools
UNSPECIFIED (2005) Developing a speciality: regearing the specialist public health workforce. PUBLIC HEALTH, 119 (3). pp. 167-173. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2004.06.007 ISSN 0033-3506.
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2004.06.007
Abstract
Objectives. To identify issues surrounding the future training needs of the specialist public health workforce following the most recent restructuring of the National Health Service (NHS) in England.
Methods. All directors of public health (DsPH) based in strategic health authorities and nine senior staff working in public health at the regional level were invited to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview.
Results. Twenty-six people were interviewed. Many interviewees expressed concern that because consultants and specialists in public health will be working in much smaller teams than hitherto, they will have to generalize their skills to cover a much wider range of functions (including board-level duties). This may result in a loss of specialist expertise. Successful public health practice in the new structures wilt require new ways of interorganizational working that will add an administrative burden to specialists in public health. Also, the creation of a board-level post in each primary care trust (PCT) has resulted in more time spent on corporate responsibilities and Less on public health for DsPH, who are often the only fully trained specialist in public health in their PCT. Furthermore, interviewees expressed their anxiety about the lack of diversity in the posts available to specialists in public health and particularly to those newly completing their specialist training. Generally, interviewees felt that traditional public health roles and responsibilities were being eclipsed by corporate and managerial ones. Professional development activities were being carried out, but in a rather ad-hoc fashion. Interviewees were hopeful that public health networks would lead professional development initiatives once they were more established.
Conclusions. It is important that excellence in public health is maintained through a set of accreditable standards, whilst corporate skills, essential to successful public health practice in the new UK NHS, are developed among specialists in public health. (C) 2004 The Royal Institute of Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | PUBLIC HEALTH | ||||
| Publisher: | W B SAUNDERS CO LTD | ||||
| ISSN: | 0033-3506 | ||||
| Official Date: | March 2005 | ||||
| Dates: |
|
||||
| Volume: | 119 | ||||
| Number: | 3 | ||||
| Number of Pages: | 7 | ||||
| Page Range: | pp. 167-173 | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.06.007 | ||||
| Publication Status: | Published |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
