Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Factors influencing revision risk following 15 740 single-brand hybrid hip arthroplasties : a cohort study from a National Joint Registry

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Jameson, Simon S., Mason, James, Baker, Paul N., Jettoo, Prithee, Deehan, David J. and Reed, Mike R. (2013) Factors influencing revision risk following 15 740 single-brand hybrid hip arthroplasties : a cohort study from a National Joint Registry. Journal of Arthroplasty, 28 (7). 1152-1159.e1. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.11.021 ISSN 1532-8406.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.11.021

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study of a National Joint Registry data examines survival time to revision following the commonest brand of primary hybrid THA, exploring risk factors independently associated with failure. Overall 5-year revision was 1.56%. In the final adjusted model, revision risk was significantly higher with standard polyethylene (PE) liners (metal-on-PE: hazard ratio [HR]=2.52, P=0.005, ceramic-on-PE: HR=2.99, P=0.025) when compared to metal-on-highly-cross-linked (XL) PE. Risk of revision with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings was borderline significant (HR=1.86, P=0.061). A significant interaction between age and acetabular shell type (solid or multi-hole) was found (P=0.022), suggesting that solid shells performed significantly better in younger patients. In summary, we found that there were significant differences in implant failure between different bearing surfaces and shell types after adjusting for a range of covariates.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Arthroplasty
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.
ISSN: 1532-8406
Official Date: August 2013
Dates:
DateEvent
August 2013Published
25 March 2013Available
30 November 2012Accepted
31 October 2012Submitted
Volume: 28
Number: 7
Page Range: 1152-1159.e1
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.11.021
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us