Mullett, Timothy L. and Stewart, Neil (2016) Implications of visual attention phenomena for models of preferential choice. Decision, 3 (4). pp. 231-253. doi:10.1037/dec0000049

	PDF WRAP_Stewart_implications.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2876Kb)
	PDF WRAP_9771026-ps-251115-mullett_stewart_in_press.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (4Mb)

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

We use computational modelling to examine the ability of evidence accumulation models to produce the reaction time distributions and attentional biases found in behavioural and eye-tracking research. We focus upon simulating reaction times and attention in binary choice with particular emphasis upon whether different models can predict the late onset bias (LOB), commonly found in eye movements during choice (sometimes called the gaze cascade). The first finding is that this bias is predicted by models even when attention is entirely random and independent of the choice process. This shows that the LOB is not evidence of a feedback loop between evidence accumulation and attention. Second, we examine models with a relative evidence decision rule and an absolute evidence rule. In the relative models a decision is made once the difference in evidence accumulated for two items reaches a threshold. In the absolute models, a decision is made once one item accumulates a certain amount of evidence, independently of how much is accumulated for a competitor. Our core result is simple – the existence of the late onset gaze bias to the option ultimately chosen, together with a positively skewed reaction time distribution means that the stopping rule must be relative not absolute. A large scale grid search of parameter space shows that absolute threshold models struggle to predict these phenomena even when incorporating evidence decay and assumptions of either mutual inhibition or feed forward inhibition.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Electronic computers. Computer science. Computer software Q Science > QP Physiology
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Behavioural Science Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Eye tracking , Reaction time
Journal or Publication Title:	Decision
Publisher:	American Psychological Association
ISSN:	2325-9965
Official Date:	October 2016
Dates:	Date Event October 2016 Published 2 November 2015 Accepted
Volume:	3
Number:	4
Page Range:	pp. 231-253
DOI:	10.1037/dec0000049
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC), Leverhulme Trust (LT)
Grant number:	ES/K002201/1, ES/K004948/1 (EPSRC), RP2012-V-022 (LT)

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item