Inducing breach of contract: one tort or two?
Simester, A. P. and Chan, Winnie M. F.. (2004) Inducing breach of contract: one tort or two? Cambridge Law Journal, Vol.63 (No.1). pp. 132-165. ISSN 0008-1973
WRAP_Simester_inducing_breach_contract.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008197304006531
IT is said to be a tort for D intentionally to induce C to break C’s contract with P. Where this occurs, P has an action in tort against D, quite apart from P’s action for breach of contract against C. But the rationale for this tort is controversial, and its legitimacy has been doubted by a number of commentators.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||K Law > KD England and Wales|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Contracts -- Great Britain, Breach of contract -- Great Britain, Liability (Law) -- Great Britain, Obligations (Law) -- Great Britain, Persuasion (Psychology)|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Cambridge Law Journal|
|Publisher:||Cambridge University Press|
|Official Date:||March 2004|
|Page Range:||pp. 132-165|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
Actions (login required)