The Library
Reply to critics
Tools
Tools
Tools
Brownlee, Kimberley (2015) Reply to critics. Criminal Law and Philosophy . doi:10.1007/s11572-015-9387-9
|
PDF
WRAP_art%3A10.1007%2Fs11572-015-9387-9.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (571Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-015-9387-9
Abstract
This article responds to the four contributors to the book symposium on Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience. Those four contributors are Thomas Hill Jr, David Lefkowitz, William Smith, and Daniel Weinstock . Hill examines the concepts of conviction and conscience (Chapters 1 and 2); Smith discusses conviction and then analyses the right to civil disobedience and my humanistic arguments for it (Chapter 4); Weinstock explores democratic challenges for civil disobedience (Chapter 5); and Lefkowitz assesses the merits of a legal demands-of-conviction excuse for civil disobedience (Chapter 5). This ‘Reply to Critics’ addresses them in turn.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | J Political Science > JC Political theory | ||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy | ||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Civil disobedience | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Criminal Law and Philosophy | ||||
| Publisher: | Springer Verlag | ||||
| ISSN: | 1871-9791 | ||||
| Official Date: | 30 December 2015 | ||||
| Dates: |
|
||||
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11572-015-9387-9 | ||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
