Brownlee, Kimberley (2015) Reply to critics. Criminal Law and Philosophy . doi:10.1007/s11572-015-9387-9 ISSN 1871-9791.

Preview

PDF WRAP_art%3A10.1007%2Fs11572-015-9387-9.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (571Kb) | Preview

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This article responds to the four contributors to the book symposium on Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience. Those four contributors are Thomas Hill Jr, David Lefkowitz, William Smith, and Daniel Weinstock . Hill examines the concepts of conviction and conscience (Chapters 1 and 2); Smith discusses conviction and then analyses the right to civil disobedience and my humanistic arguments for it (Chapter 4); Weinstock explores democratic challenges for civil disobedience (Chapter 5); and Lefkowitz assesses the merits of a legal demands-of-conviction excuse for civil disobedience (Chapter 5). This ‘Reply to Critics’ addresses them in turn.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	J Political Science > JC Political theory
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Civil disobedience
Journal or Publication Title:	Criminal Law and Philosophy
Publisher:	Springer Verlag
ISSN:	1871-9791
Official Date:	30 December 2015
Dates:	Date Event 30 December 2015 Published
DOI:	10.1007/s11572-015-9387-9
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit:	22 January 2016
Date of first compliant Open Access:	25 January 2016

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads