Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Contracts with endogenous information

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Szalay, Dezsö (2007) Contracts with endogenous information. Working Paper. : Unpublished..

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Szalay_infovaluegames2rev121207.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (343Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/...

Abstract

I study covert information acquisition and reporting in a principal agent problem allowing for general technologies of information acquisition. When posteriors satisfy two dimensional versions of the standard First Order Stochastic Dominance and Concavity/Convexity of the Distribution Function conditions, a first-order approach is justfied. Under the same conditions, informativeness and riskiness of reports are equivalent. High powered contracts, that make the agent's informational rents more risky, are used to increase incentives for information acquisition, insensitive contracts are used to reduce incentives for information gathering. The value of information to the agent is always positive. The value of information to the principal is ambiguous.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Other > Learning and Development Centre
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Information, Stochastic orders
Publisher: Unpublished
Place of Publication:
Date: 11 December 2007
Number of Pages: 49
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: Working paper
References: Armstrong, M., and Rochet, J.-C. (1999). Multi-dimensional screening: a user’s guide. Euro- pean Economic Review 43, pp.959-979. Athey, S., and Levin, J. (2001). The value of information in monotone decision problems. Working paper, Stanford University. Baron, D. and Myerson, R. (1982). Regulating a monopolist with unknown costs.Econometrica, 50, pp.911-930. Bagnoli, M., and Bergstrom T. (1989). Logconcave probability and its applications. Discussion paper 89-23, University of Michigan. Biais, B., Martimort, D., and Rochet, J.-C. (2000). Competing mechanisms in a common value environment. Econometrica, 68(4), pp.799-837. Bergemann, D. and Välimäki, J. (2002). Information acquisition and efficient mechanism design. Econometrica, 70, pp.1007-1033. Blackwell, D. (1951). Comparison of experiments. In: Neyman, J., ed. Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp.93-102. Compte, O. and Jehiel, Ph. (2002). Gathering information before signing a contract: a new perspective. Working paper. Crémer, J. and Khalil, F. (1992). Gathering information before signing a contract. American Economic Review, 82(3), pp.566-578 Crémer, J., Khalil, F. and Rochet, J.-C. (1998a). Contracts and productive information gathering.Games and Economic Behavior, 25, pp.174-193. Crémer, J., Khalil, F. and Rochet, J.-C. (1998b). Strategic information gathering before a contract is offered. Journal of Economic Theory, 81, pp.163-200. Dai, C. and Lewis, T. (2005). Delegating procurement to experts., forthcoming Rand Journal of Economics. Demski, J. and Sappington, D. (1987). Delegated expertise. Journal of Accounting Research, 25(1), pp.68-89. Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1991). Game theory. MIT Press. Guesnerie, R. and Laffont, J.J. (1984). A complete solution for a class of agency problems. Journal of Public Economics, pp.329-369. Green, J., and Stokey, N. (1981). The value of information in the delegation problem. Discussion Paper 776, Harvard University. Grossman, S. and Hart, O. (1983). An analysis of the principal agent problem. Econometrica, 51, pp.7-46. Gromb, D, and Martimort, D. (2004). The organization of delegated expertise. CEPR Discussion Paper 4572. Hausch, D, and Li, L. (1993). A common value auction model with endogenous entry and information Acquisition, pp.315-334. Jewitt, I. (1988). Justifying the first order approach to principal agent problems. Econometrica, 56(5), pp.1177-1190. Johnson, J. and Myatt, D. (2006). On the simple economics of advertising, marketing, and product design., forthcoming American Economic Review. Karlin, S. and Rubin, H. (1956). The theory of decision procedures for distributions with monotone likelihood ratio. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, pp.272-299. Laffont, J.-J., and Martimort, D. (2002). The principal-agent model. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford. Laffont, J.-J., and Tirole, J. (1993). A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts. Lewis, T. and Sappington, D. (1993). Ignorance in agency problems. Journal of Economic Theory, 61, pp.169-183. Lewis T. and Sappington, D. (1997). Information management in incentive problems. Journal of Political Economy, 105(4), pp.796-821. Malcomson, J. (2004). Principal and expert agent. University of Oxford, Department of Eco- nomics Working Paper 193. McAfee, R. and McMillan, J. (1988). Multidimensional incentive compatibility and mechanism design. Journal of Economic Theory, 46(2), pp.335-354. Milgrom, P. (1981). Good news and bad news: Representation Theorems and Applications. Bell Journal of Economics, 12, pp.380-391. Myerson (1981). Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6, pp.58-73. Nelsen, R. B. (2006). An introduction to copulas. Second Edition (Springer Series in Statistics), Springer Science and Business Media, New York. Ottaviani and Sorensen (2001). Professional advice: the theory of reputational cheap talk. Working paper LBS. Persico, N. (2000). Information acquisition in auctions. Econometrica, 68 (1), pp.135-48. Rochet, J.-C. (1985). The taxation principle and multitime hamilton-jacobi equations. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 14, pp.113-128. Rochet, J.-C. and Stole, L. (2003). The economics of multidimensional screening. Forthcoming in Advances in economic theory, edited by M. Dewatripont, L. Hansen and S. Turnovsky, Cambridge University Press. Rogerson, P. (1985). The first order approach to principal agent problems. Econometrica, pp.1357-1368 Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J. (1970). Increasing risk i: a definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, pp.225-243. Shi, X. (2006). Optimal auctions with information acquisition. Mimeo, Yale. Sobel, J. (1993). Information control in the principal agent problem. International Economic Review, 34(2), pp.259-269. Stegemann, M. (1996). Participation costs and efficient auctions. Journal of Economic Theory, 71, pp.228-259. Szalay, D. (2005). The economics of extreme options and clear advice. Review of Economic Studies, 72, pp.1173-1198. Tan, G. (1992). Entry and R&D in procurement contracting. Journal of Economic Theory, 58, pp.41-60.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/77

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us