The Library
Barrels and bullets : the geostrategic significance of Russia’s oil and gas exports
Tools
Tools
Tools
Bradshaw, Michael J. and Connolly, Richard (2016) Barrels and bullets : the geostrategic significance of Russia’s oil and gas exports. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 72 (3). pp. 156-164. doi:10.1080/00963402.2016.1170372 ISSN 1938-3282.
|
PDF
WRAP_1273389-wbs-200616-barrels_and_bullets_bradshaw__connolly_bas_2016__22_02-16.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (551Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2016.1170372
Abstract
In 1953, US President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned about the hidden costs of what he was to later describe as the “military-industrial complex.” Ike said: “We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people.” The leaders of today’s Russia face a twenty-first-century version of this dilemma, weighing the trade-off between spending on guns or butter. Russia’s own defense-industrial complex (known as the oboronnyi-promyshlennyi kompleks, or OPK) has been the recipient of billions of dollars in the past few years, as the state ordered new weapons such as the T-50 PAK-FA fifth-generation fighter aircraft, the Armata main battle tank, new nuclear-powered submarines, and strategic missiles. Should they continue the costly effort to remake their military into one of the most numerous and sophisticated forces in the world? Or should Russia’s leaders instead focus their efforts on investing in health, education, infrastructure, and other areas to help build a more dynamic and competitive economy? The answer to this question will be partially shaped by how much money Russia’s leaders will have to spend; with the crash in the value of oil exports – the unstable pillar of this Eurasian petro-state – what funds can they expect to draw upon? Decision-makers in the Kremlin will also be influenced by their perception of whether Russia faces a hostile geopolitical environment. If the current view prevails, it is possible that Russia’s leaders may choose to maintain military spending even as the economy sinks into stagnation.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | D History General and Old World > DK Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor U Military Science > U Military Science (General) |
||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Global Energy Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School |
||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Petroleum industry and trade -- Russia, Petroleum -- Prices -- Industrial capacity, Natural gas, Gas industry , Armed Forces -- Appropriations and expenditures, Putin, Vladimir Vladimirovich, 1952- | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists | ||||
| Publisher: | Routledge | ||||
| ISSN: | 1938-3282 | ||||
| Official Date: | 15 April 2016 | ||||
| Dates: |
|
||||
| Volume: | 72 | ||||
| Number: | 3 | ||||
| Page Range: | pp. 156-164 | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1080/00963402.2016.1170372 | ||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 20 June 2016 | ||||
| Date of first compliant Open Access: | 15 October 2017 |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
