Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

A robust preference for cheap-and-easy strategies over reliable strategies when verifying personal memories

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Nash, Robert Alastair, Wade, Kimberley A. , Garry, Maryanne and Adelman, James S. (2017) A robust preference for cheap-and-easy strategies over reliable strategies when verifying personal memories. Memory, 25 (7). pp. 890-899. doi:10.1080/09658211.2016.1214280 ISSN 0965-8211.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-robust-cheap-strategies-memories-Wade-2016.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (998Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1214280

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

People depend on various sources of information when trying to verify their autobiographical memories. Yet recent research shows that people prefer to use cheap-and-easy verification strategies, even when these strategies are not reliable. We examined the robustness of this cheap strategy bias, with scenarios designed to encourage greater emphasis on source reliability. In three experiments, subjects described real (Experiments 1 and 2) or hypothetical (Experiment 3) autobiographical events, and proposed strategies they might use to verify their memories of those events. Subjects also rated the reliability, cost,
and the likelihood that they would use each strategy. In line with previous work, we found that the preference for cheap information held when people described how they would verify childhood or recent memories (Experiment 1); personally-important or trivial memories (Experiment 2), and even when the consequences of relying on incorrect information could be significant (Experiment 3). Taken together, our findings fit with an account of source monitoring in which the tendency to trust one’s own autobiographical memories
can discourage people from systematically testing or accepting strong
disconfirmatory evidence.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Autobiographical memory, False memory syndrome, Memory -- Psychological aspects, Least effort principle (Psychology)
Journal or Publication Title: Memory
Publisher: Psychology Press
ISSN: 0965-8211
Official Date: 2017
Dates:
DateEvent
2017Published
2 August 2016Available
13 July 2016Accepted
Volume: 25
Number: 7
Number of Pages: 10
Page Range: pp. 890-899
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1214280
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 19 July 2016
Date of first compliant Open Access: 2 August 2017

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us