A national facilitation project to improve primary palliative care : impact of the Gold Standards Framework on process and self-ratings of quality
Dale, Jeremy, 1958-, Petrova, Mila, Munday, Dan, Koistinen-Harris, J., Lall, Ranjit (Statistician) and Thomas, K.. (2009) A national facilitation project to improve primary palliative care : impact of the Gold Standards Framework on process and self-ratings of quality. Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol.18 (No.3). pp. 174-180. ISSN 1475-3898
WRAP_Dale_National_facilitation.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.024836
Background: Improving quality of end-of-life care is a key driver of UK policy. The Gold Standards Framework (GSF) for Palliative Care aims to strengthen primary palliative care through facilitating implementation of systematic clinical and organisational processes.
Objectives: To describe the general practices that participated in the GSF programme in 2003–5 and the changes in process and perception of quality that occurred in the year following entry into the programme, and to identify factors associated with the extent of change.
Methods: Participating practices completed a questionnaire at baseline and another approximately 12 months later. Data were derived from categorical questions about the implementation of 35 organisational and clinical processes, and self-rated assessments of quality, associated with palliative care provision.
Participants: 1305 practices (total registered population almost 10 million). Follow-up questionnaire completed by 955 (73.2%) practices (after mean (SD) 12.8 (2.8) months; median 13 months).
Findings: Mean increase in total number of processes implemented (maximum = 35) was 9.6 (95% CI 9.0 to 10.2; p<0.001; baseline: 15.7 (SD 6.4), follow-up: 25.2 (SD 5.2)). Extent of change was largest for practices with low baseline scores. Aspects of process related to coordination and communication showed the greatest change. All dimensions of quality improved following GSF implementation; change was highest for the "quality of palliative care for cancer patients" and "confidence in assessing, recording and addressing the physical and psychosocial areas of patient care".
Conclusion: Implementation of the GSF seems to have resulted in substantial improvements in process and quality of palliative care. Further research is required of the extent to which this has enhanced care (physical, practical and psychological outcomes) for patients and carers.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||R Medicine > R Medicine (General)|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Great Britain) , Palliative treatment -- Great Britain, Medicine -- Research -- Great Britain, Primary care (Medicine), Terminal care -- Great Britain|
|Journal or Publication Title:||Quality and Safety in Health Care|
|Official Date:||June 2009|
|Page Range:||pp. 174-180|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|Funder:||Macmillan Cancer Support (Great Britain) (MCS)|
# Murray S, Boyd K, Sheikh A, et al.. Developing primary palliative care. BMJ 2004;329:1056–7.[Free Full Text]
Actions (login required)