Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Comprehensively mapping political science methods : an instructors' survey

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Blanchard, Philippe, Rihoux, Benoît, 1965- and Álamos-Concha, Priscilla (2017) Comprehensively mapping political science methods : an instructors' survey. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20 (2). pp. 209-224. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1129128 ISSN 1364-5579.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_BlanchardRihouxAlamos-LastVersion.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (1298Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1129128

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

A map provides a unique view over the complex relationships of competition and complementarity between methods. It goes beyond the usual approaches to methods, namely monographic, mixed, encyclopaedic and classificatory. A diverse set of 50 social and political science methods instructors were surveyed about their specialty along 17 dimensions that are regarded as contrasting by the methodology literature. Correspondence analysis and cluster analysis were used to reveal response profiles and proximities between courses. Results show that the ‘qualitative/quantitative’ divide appears structuring, but not as much as is often conceived. Quantitative-oriented courses form a rather cohesive cluster whereas qualitative courses display high variability regarding empirical material, scales of observation, techniques and epistemologies. The resulting global picture accounts for more dimensions of the quickly expanding space of methods than usual typologies of methods do. We hope it will stimulate new methodological combinations and new ways of teaching methods.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Political science -- Study and teaching
Journal or Publication Title: International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Publisher: Routledge
ISSN: 1364-5579
Official Date: 4 March 2017
Dates:
DateEvent
4 March 2017Published
2 February 2016Available
1 December 2015Accepted
7 January 2014Submitted
Volume: 20
Number: 2
Page Range: pp. 209-224
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1129128
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 28 July 2016
Date of first compliant Open Access: 2 September 2017

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us