Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The dehumanization of International Humanitarian Law : legal, ethical, and political implications of autonomous weapon systems

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Wagner, Markus (2014) The dehumanization of International Humanitarian Law : legal, ethical, and political implications of autonomous weapon systems. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 47 (5). pp. 1371-1424.

[img] PDF
WRAP_Wagner_2C the dehumanization of international humanitarian law.pdf - Published Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (688Kb)
Official URL: https://wp0.its.vanderbilt.edu/jotl/2014/12/the-de...

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

In the future, a growing number of combat operations will be carried out by autonomous weapon systems (AWS). At the operational level, AWS would not rely on direct human input. Taking humans out of the loop will raise questions of the compatibility of AWS with the fundamental requirements of international humanitarian law (IHL), such as the principles of distinction and proportionality, as well as complicate allocation of responsibility for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

This Article addresses the development toward greater autonomy in military technology along three dimensions: legal, ethical, and political concerns. First, it analyzes the potential dehumanizing effect of AWS with respect to the principles of distinction and proportionality and criminal responsibility.

Second, this Article explores, from an ethical perspective, the advantages and disadvantages of the deployment of AWS independent of legal considerations. Authors from various fields have weighed in on this debate, but oftentimes without linking their discourse to legal questions. This Article fills this gap by bridging these disparate discourses and suggests that there are important ethical reasons that militate against the use of AWS.

Third, this Article argues that the introduction of AWS alters the risk calculus of whether to engage in or prolong an armed conflict. This alteration is likely to make that decision politically more palatable and less risky for the political decision makers.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal or Publication Title: Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Publisher: Vanderbilt University Law School
ISSN: 0090-2594
Official Date: 22 December 2014
Dates:
DateEvent
22 December 2014Published
1 January 2014Accepted
Date of first compliant deposit: 14 February 2017
Volume: 47
Number: 5
Page Range: pp. 1371-1424
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Open Access Version:
  • SSRN

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us