Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

WTO Law and the right to regulate : China – rare earths

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Wagner, Markus (2014) WTO Law and the right to regulate : China – rare earths. ASIL Insights, 18 (10).

An open access version can be found in:
  • SSRN
  • Publisher
Official URL: https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/18/issue/10/w...

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

On March 26, 2014, a World Trade Organization (WTO) panel issued its report on a dispute between the European Union, Japan and the United States as complainants and China as respondent over access to so-called “rare earths,” as well as tungsten and molybdenum. The Panel found that China violated its obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT) and the Accession Protocol by restricting exports of rare earths to manufacturers in other countries, while favoring Chinese competitors. Moreover, the Panel found that China could not invoke justifications under GATT Article XX to justify violation of the relevant provisions of its Accession Protocol and, in any case, China had not satisfied the requirements of Article XX. The Panel decision has implications for China’s right to regulate under the terms of its Accession Protocol as well as the nature of precedent in WTO dispute settlement. These issues will likely be further addressed by the Appellate Body following the United States’ and China’s appeal of the Panel Report.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal or Publication Title: ASIL Insights
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Official Date: 28 April 2014
Dates:
DateEvent
28 April 2014Published
15 April 2014Accepted
Volume: 18
Number: 10
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Open Access Version:
  • SSRN
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us