Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Comparison of neural network predictors in the classification of tracheal-bronchial breath sounds by respiratory auscultation

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED. (2004) Comparison of neural network predictors in the classification of tracheal-bronchial breath sounds by respiratory auscultation. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 31 (3). pp. 211-220. ISSN 0933-3657

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2004.01.004

Abstract

Despite extensive research in the area of identification and discrimination of tracheal-bronchial breath sounds by computer analysis, the process of identifying auscultated sounds is still subject to high estimation uncertainties. Here we assess the performance of the relatively new constructive probabilistic neural network (CPNN) against the more common classifiers, namely the multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis function network (RBFN), in classifying a broad range of tracheal-bronchial breath sounds. We present our data as signal estimation models of the tracheal bronchial frequency spectra. We have examined the trained structure of the CPNN with respect to the other architectures and conclude that this architecture offers an attractive means with which to analyse this type of data. This is based partly on the classification accuracies attained by the CPNN, MLP and RBFN which were 97.8, 77.8 and 96.2%, respectively. We concluded that CPNN and RBFN networks are capable of working successfully with this data, with these architectures being acceptable in terms of topological size and computational overhead requirements. We further believe that the CPNN is an attractive classification mechanism for auscultated data analysis due to its optimal data model generation properties and computationally lightweight architecture. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Electronic computers. Computer science. Computer software
R Medicine
Journal or Publication Title: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
ISSN: 0933-3657
Date: July 2004
Volume: 31
Number: 3
Number of Pages: 10
Page Range: pp. 211-220
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.01.004
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/8109

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us