Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Ensemble coding and two conceptions of perceptual sparsity

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

McClelland, Tom and Bayne, Tim (2016) Ensemble coding and two conceptions of perceptual sparsity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20 (9). pp. 641-642. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.008

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.008

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

In their paper “What is the Bandwidth of Perceptual Experience” Cohen et al. contribute to a growing literature [1] on the implications of ensemble coding (also known as summary statistics) for accounts of the bandwidth of perception [2,3]. According to the sparse view, the bandwidth of perception is very narrow, and subjects have conscious access only to the handful of objects that get through the bottleneck of attention and/or working memory. Cohen et al. argue that ensemble coding research undermines the sparse view.

Item Type: Journal Item
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy
Journal or Publication Title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher: Elsevier Science
ISSN: 1364-6613
Official Date: September 2016
Dates:
DateEvent
September 2016Published
12 July 2016Available
1 February 2016Accepted
Volume: 20
Number: 9
Page Range: pp. 641-642
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.008
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us