Merger simulations of unilateral effects : what can we learn from the UK brewing industry?
Slade, Margaret E., 1940- (2006) Merger simulations of unilateral effects : what can we learn from the UK brewing industry? Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. (Warwick economic research papers.
WRAP_Slade_twerp_767.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...
I discuss the use of simulation techniques to evaluate unilateral effects of horizontal mergers and the pitfalls that one can encounter when using them. Simple econometric models are desirable because they can be implemented in a short period of time and can be understood by non experts. Unfortunately, their predictions are often misleading. Complex models are more reliable but they require more time to implement and are less transparent. The use of merger simulations and the sensitivity of predictions to modeling choices is illustrated with an application to mergers in the UK brewing industry. There have been a number of brewing mergers that have changed the structure of the UK market, as well as proposed but unconsummated mergers that would have had even more profound effects. I assess two of them: the successful merger between Scottish&Newcastle and Courage and the proposed merger between Bass and Carlsberg–Tetley.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Brewing industry -- Mergers -- Great Britain|
|Series Name:||Warwick economic research papers|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick, Department of Economics|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||41|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|Funder:||Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)|
|Version or Related Resource:||Slade, M. (forthcoming) Merger simulations of unilateral effects: what can we learn from the UK brewing industry? In B. Lyons (ed) Cases in European Competition Policy: The Economic Analysis, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.|
|References:||Brenkers, R. and Verboven, F. (2006). Liberalizing a distribution system: the european car market. Journal of the European Economics Association, 4, pp.216– 251. Brewers and Licensed Retailers Association (various years). Statistical handbook, London. British Beer & Pub Association (2005). Statistical handbook, London. Compte, O., Jenny, F. and Rey, P. (2002). Capacity constraints, mergers, and collusion. European Economic Review, 46, pp.1–29. Director General of Fair Trading (DGFT) (1995). Memo to the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry. Epstein, R.J. and Rubinfeld, D. (2002). Merger simulation: a simplified approach with new applications. Antitrust Law Journal, 69, pp.883–906. Hausman, J.A., Leonard, G.K., and Zona, D. (1994). Competitive analysis with differentiated products. Annales d’Econometrie et de Statistique, 34, pp.159-180. Hausman, J.A. and Leonard, G.K. (2005). Using merger simulation models: testing the underlying assumptions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, pp.693–698. Ivaldi, M. and Verboven, F., (2005). Quantifying the effects from horizontal mergers: the European heavy trucks market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, pp.669–692. Jayaratne, J. and Shapiro, C., (2000). Simulating partial asset divestitures to ‘fix’ mergers. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 7, pp.179–200. Kuhn, K.-U. (2000). An economists’ guide through the joint dominance jungle. Mimeo. Kuhn, K.-U. (2005). The coordinated effects of mergers in differentiated products markets. CEPR Discussion Paper, 4769. Lafontaine, F. and Slade, M.E. (2006). Vertical integration and firm boundaries: the evidence. University of Warwick mimeo. Lexicon Ltd. (1999). Joint dominance. Competition Memo, London. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: P. Zarembka (ed.). Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic: New York, pp.105–142. Monopolies and Mergers Commission (MMC) (1989). The supply of beer. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. Monopolies and Mergers Commission (MMC) (1997). Bass PLC, Carlsberg A/S, and Carlsberg–Tetley PLC: a report on the merger situation. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. Nevo, A. (2000). Mergers with differentiated products: the case of the ready-to- eat cereal industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 31, pp.395–421. Pinkse, J., Slade, M.E., and Brett, C. (2002). Spatial price competition: a semiparametric approach. Econometrica, 70, pp.1111–1155. Pinkse, J. and Slade, M.E. (2004). Mergers, brand competition, and the price of a pint. European Economic Review, 48, pp.617–643. Sibley, D.S. and Heyer, K. (2003). Selected economic analysis at the antitrust division: the year in review. Review of Industrial Organization, 23, pp.95–119. Slade, M.E. (1998). Beer and the tie: did divestiture of brewer–owned public houses lead to higher beer prices? Economic Journal, 108, pp.565–602. Slade, M.E. (2000). Regulating manufacturers and their exclusive retailers. In: M. Berg and E. Hope (eds.). Foundations of competition policy. London: Routledge. Slade, M.E. (2004a). Market power and joint dominance in the UK brewing industry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 52, pp.133-163. Slade, M.E. (2004b). Models of firm profitability. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, pp.289–308. Werden, G.J., and Froeb, L.M. (1994). The effects of mergers in differentiated products industries: logit demand and merger policy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 10, pp.407–426. Werden, G.J., and Froeb, L.M. (2002). The antitrust logit model for predicting unilateral competitive effects. Antitrust Law Journal, 70, pp.257.|
Actions (login required)