Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Critical review of the United Kingdoms "gold standard" survey of public attitudes to science

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Smith, Benjamin K. and Jensen, Eric (2016) Critical review of the United Kingdoms "gold standard" survey of public attitudes to science. Public Understanding of Science, 25 (2). pp. 154-170. doi:10.1177/0963662515623248

[img] PDF
WRAP_critical_review_of_pas_2014_final_accepted_version_for_circulating-smith_jensen.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (708Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515623248

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Since 2000, the UK government has funded surveys aimed at understanding the UK public’s attitudes toward science, scientists, and science policy. Known as the Public Attitudes to Science series, these surveys and their predecessors have long been used in UK science communication policy, practice, and scholarship as a source of authoritative knowledge about science-related attitudes and behaviors. Given their importance and the significant public funding investment they represent, detailed academic scrutiny of the studies is needed. In this essay, we critically review the most recently published Public Attitudes to Science survey (2014), assessing the robustness of its methods and claims. The review casts doubt on the quality of key elements of the Public Attitudes to Science 2014 survey data and analysis while highlighting the importance of robust quantitative social research methodology. Our analysis comparing the main sample and booster sample for young people demonstrates that quota sampling cannot be assumed equivalent to probability-based sampling techniques.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HA Statistics
Q Science > Q Science (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Science -- Public opinion -- Great Britain, Surveys -- Statistical methods
Journal or Publication Title: Public Understanding of Science
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN: 0963-6625
Official Date: February 2016
Dates:
DateEvent
February 2016Published
18 January 2016Available
Volume: 25
Number: 2
Page Range: pp. 154-170
DOI: 10.1177/0963662515623248
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us