Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Rational expectations and farsighted stability

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Dutta, Bhaskar and Rajiv, Vohra (2017) Rational expectations and farsighted stability. Theoretical Economics, 12 (3). pp. 1191-1227. doi:10.3982/TE2454 ISSN 1933-6837.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-rational-expectations-farsighted-stability-Dutta-2017.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0.

Download (761Kb) | Preview
[img] PDF
WRAP_bhaskar_dutta_refs16-17.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (432Kb)
Official URL: http://doi.org/10.3982/TE2454

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

In the study of farsighted coalitional behavior, a central role is played by the von Neumann-Morgenstern (1944) stable set and its modification that incorporates farsightedness. Such a modification was first proposed by Harsanyi (1974) and has recently been re-formulated by Ray and Vohra (2015). The farsighted stable set is based on a notion of indirect dominance in which an outcome can be dominated by a chain of coalitional ‘moves’ in which each coalition that is involved in the sequence eventually stands to gain. However, it does not require that each coalition make a maximal move, i.e., one that is not Pareto dominated (for the members of the coalition in question) by another. Consequently, when there are multiple continuation paths the farsighted stable set can yield unreasonable predictions. We restrict coalitions to hold common, history independent expectations that incorporate maximality regarding the continuation path. This leads to two related solution concepts: the rational expectations farsighted stable set (REFS) and the strong rational expectations farsighted stable set (SREFS). We apply these concepts to simple games and to pillage games to illustrate the consequences of imposing rational expectations for farsighted stability

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Coalitions -- Economic aspects -- Mathematical models
Journal or Publication Title: Theoretical Economics
Publisher: Econometric Society
ISSN: 1933-6837
Official Date: September 2017
Dates:
DateEvent
September 2017Published
22 September 2017Available
14 October 2016Accepted
Volume: 12
Number: 3
Page Range: pp. 1191-1227
DOI: 10.3982/TE2454
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 13 October 2016
Date of first compliant Open Access: 28 November 2017

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us