UNSPECIFIED (2002) Is LF really a linguistic level? [Journal Item]

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Carruthers's argument depends on viewing logical form as a linguistic level. But logical form is typically viewed as underpinning general purpose inference, and hence as having no particular connection to language processing. If logical form is tied directly to language, two problems arise: a logical problem concerning language acquisition and the empirical problem that aphasics appear capable of cross-modular reasoning.

Item Type:	Journal Item
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Journal or Publication Title:	BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
Publisher:	CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
ISSN:	0140-525X
Date:	December 2002
Volume:	25
Number:	6
Number of Pages:	8
Page Range:	680-+
Publication Status:	Published
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/8280

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item