Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Fieldwork effort, response rate and the distribution of survey outcomes : a multi-level meta-analysis

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Sturgis, Patrick, Williams, Joel, Brunton-Smith, Ian and Moore, Jamie (2017) Fieldwork effort, response rate and the distribution of survey outcomes : a multi-level meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81 (2). pp. 523-542. doi:10.1093/poq/nfw055

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-fieldwork-rate-distribution-multi-level-2017.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (2163Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw055

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This study assesses how survey outcome distributions change over repeated calls made to addresses in face-to-face household interview surveys. We consider this question for 541 survey variables, drawn from six major face-to-face UK surveys that have different sample designs, cover different topic areas, and achieve response rates between 54 and 76 percent. Using a multilevel meta-analytic framework, we estimate for each survey variable the expected difference between the point estimate for a proportion at call n and for the full achieved sample. Results show that most variables are surprisingly close to the final achieved sample distribution after only one or two call attempts and before any post-stratification weighting has been applied; the mean expected difference from the final sample proportion across all 559 variables after one call is 1.6 percent, dropping to 0.7 percent after three calls and to 0.4 percent after five calls. These estimates vary only marginally across the six surveys and the different types of questions examined. Our findings add weight to the body of evidence that questions the strength of the relationship between response rate and nonresponse bias. In practical terms, our results suggest that making large numbers of calls at sampled addresses and converting “soft” refusals into interviews are not cost-effective means of minimizing survey error.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Household surveys -- Response rate -- Great Britain
Journal or Publication Title: Public Opinion Quarterly
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 0033-362X
Official Date: 30 May 2017
Dates:
DateEvent
30 May 2017Published
13 December 2016Available
27 July 2016Accepted
Volume: 81
Number: 2
Page Range: pp. 523-542
DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfw055
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)
Grant number: ES/L008351/1
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us