The Library
Abusing vulnerability? Contemporary law and policy responses to sex work in the UK
Tools
Munro, Vanessa and Scoular, Jane (2012) Abusing vulnerability? Contemporary law and policy responses to sex work in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies, 20 (3). pp. 189-206. doi:10.1007/s10691-012-9213-x ISSN 0966-3622.
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9213-x
Abstract
There has been an exponential rise in use of the term vulnerability across a number of political and policy arenas, including child protection, sexual offences, poverty, development, care for the elderly, patient autonomy, globalisation, war, public health and ecology. Yet despite its increasing deployment, the exact meaning and parameters of this concept remain somewhat elusive. In this article, we explore the interaction of two very different strategies—one in which vulnerability is relied upon by those seeking improved social justice as a mechanism by which to identify, problematise and compel state responses to a universal condition of precarious dependency, and the other in which it is used as a category of neo-liberal governance which legitimates state encroachment whilst constructing ‘vulnerable’ individuals as ‘risk-managers’ who must behave ‘responsibly’ in the face of disadvantage. We suggest that the co-existence of these divergent approaches highlights the fluidity and malleability of the concept of vulnerability. Using sex work as a specific case study, we explore the ways in which vulnerability bears multiple meanings, and has been used in recent times in the furtherance of moralistic and regressive agendas, which collude with, rather than challenge, state power. Without seeking to reject the label or normative import of vulnerability, we call, therefore, for a more circumspect approach to its usage, and a more critical evaluation of recent claims which hail it as a mechanism, preferable to the conventional use of equality paradigms, by which to secure progressive feminist outcomes.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law | ||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Feminist Legal Studies | ||||||
Publisher: | Springer Netherlands | ||||||
ISSN: | 0966-3622 | ||||||
Official Date: | 2012 | ||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||
Volume: | 20 | ||||||
Number: | 3 | ||||||
Page Range: | pp. 189-206 | ||||||
DOI: | 10.1007/s10691-012-9213-x | ||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |