The Library

The pleasures of learning at work : Foucault and phenomenology compared

Tools

Hughes, Christina. (2007) The pleasures of learning at work : Foucault and phenomenology compared. British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol.28 (No.3). pp. 363-376. ISSN 0142-5692

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Hughes_The_Pleasures_of_Learning_at_Work.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (83Kb)

Microsoft Word
WRAP_Hughes_The_Pleasures_of_Learning_at_Work.doc
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (82Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425690701253430

Abstract

This paper provides a comparative account of two conceptualisations of pleasure. The first draws on Foucault's analysis of bio-power. The second provides a phenomenological account where pleasure is viewed as an aspect of our immediate consciousness. These conceptualizations are illuminated through an analysis of employees’ accounts of learning at work. Overall, the paper demonstrates how, in a Foucauldian analysis, pleasure disappears as it becomes a cipher for power whereas within the phenomenological account pleasure is foregrounded but power disappears. The concluding section focuses on the problems of both conceptualizations and explores whether we should simply accept that different analytical frameworks do different work for us or whether we should be more concerned at the losses, and gains, associated with theoretical choices. The conclusion further asks whether a concern to foreground pleasure in accounts of learning represents an antidote to the pessimism of much critical analysis or whether we should treat pleasure as a morally duplicitous category that encourages political apathy.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Pleasure -- Social aspects, Consciousness, Foucault, Michel, 1926-1984 -- Contributions in sociology, Vocational education
Journal or Publication Title:	British Journal of Sociology of Education
Publisher:	Taylor and Francis
ISSN:	0142-5692
Date:	May 2007
Volume:	Vol.28
Number:	No.3
Page Range:	pp. 363-376
Identification Number:	10.1080/01425690701253430
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Description:	Final version (as published)
References:	Barthes, R. (1975). The pleasure of the text. Toronto: Doubleday. Blaxter, L., Hughes, C. and Tight, M. (1997). Education, work and adult life: how adults relate their learning to their work, family and social lives. In: Sutherland, P., ed. Adult Learning: A Reader. London: Kogan Page. Brookfield, S. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Brown, G. with Bull, J. and Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. London: Sage. Danahier, G., Schirato, T. and Webb, J. (2000). Understanding Foucault. London: Sage. Davies, B., Dormer, S., Gannon, S., Laws, C., Taguchi, H., McCann, H. and Rocco, S. (2001). Becoming schoolgirls: the ambivalent project of subjectification. Gender and Education. 13(2), pp. 167-182. Edwards, R. and Usher, R. (2000). Globalisation and pedagogy: space, place and identity. London: Routledge/Falmer. Edwards, R. and Usher, R. (2001). Lifelong learning: a postmodern condition of education? Adult Education Quarterly. 51(4), pp. 273-287. Foucault, M. (1985). The use of pleasure: the history of sexuality, Vol II. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Gard, M. and Meyenn, R. (2000). Boys, Bodies, Pleasure and Pain: Interrogating Contact Sports in Schools. Sport, Education and Society, 5(1), pp. 19-34. Garrick, J. (1998). Informal Learning in the Workplace: Unmasking Human Resource Development. London: Routledge. Groden, M. and Kreiswirth, M. (1997). The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism. [Online] (http://www.press.jhu.edu/books/hopkins_guide_to_literary-theory/roaldn_barthes.html) Philadelphia: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Accessed 23 February 2005). Groenewald, T. (2004) A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated. [Online] (http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/3_pdf/groenewald.pdf) International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), pp. 1-26. (Accessed 19 March 2005). Hughes, C. (2002). Scaling the theoretical wall of the poststructural-modern impasse through the case of the woman returner as ‘exile’ and ‘nomad’. Gender and Education, 14(4), pp. 411-424. Huserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Evanston: North Western University Press. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. McWilliam, E. (1996). Touchy Subjects: A Risky Inquiry into Pedagogical Pleasure. British Educational Research Journal, 22(3), pp. 305-317. McWilliam, E. and Jones, A. (1996) Eros and Pedagogical Bodies: the state of (non)affairs. In: McWilliam, E. and Taylor, P., eds. Pedagogy, Technology and the Body. New York: Peter Lang. McWilliam, E. (1999). Pedagogical Pleasures. New York: Peter Lang. Moi, T. (1999). What is Woman? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Parry, O. and Mauthner, N. (2004). Whose Data Are They Anyway? Practical, Legal and Ethical Issues in Archiving Qualitative Research Data. Sociology, 38(1), pp. 139-152. Promozic, D. (2001). On Merleau-Ponty. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Swan, E. (2005). Bodies, Rhinestones and Pleasures: Women teaching managers. Management Learning, 36(3). Tight, M. (1998). Lifelong Learning: Opportunity or Compulsion? British Journal of Educational Studies, 46(3), pp. 251-263. Velarde-Mayol, V. (2000). On Husserl. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth. Willis, P. (2001). The 'Things Themselves' in Phenomenology. [Online] (www.ipjp.org) Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 1 (1), pp. 1-14. (Accessed 15 March 2005).
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/84