
The Library
Prescription hypnotics in the news : a study of UK audiences
Tools
Gabe, Jonathan, Williams, Simon J. and Coveney, Catherine (2017) Prescription hypnotics in the news : a study of UK audiences. Social Science and Medicine, 174 . pp. 43-52. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.029 ISSN 0277-9536.
![]() |
PDF
WRAP_1-s2.0-S0277953616306487-main.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (567Kb) |
![]() |
PDF
WRAP_Hypnotics in the news final clean.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (481Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.029
Abstract
In 2012 the UK media reported the results of a paper in the British Medical Journal Open, including the finding that hypnotics increase the risk of ‘premature death’. Taking this media coverage as a case study, the paper explores UK people's responses and assesses the implications for the debate about the (de)pharmaceuticalisation of sleep. Two hundred and fifty one posts to the websites of 6 UK newspapers were analysed thematically, along with 12 focus group discussions (n = 51) of newspaper coverage from one UK newspaper. Four thematic responses were identified: bad science/ journalism, Hobson's choice, risk assessment and challenging pharmaceuticalisation. We found that most people claimed that the story did not worry them, even if they stated that they were using sleeping pills, and that focus group members generally appeared to respond in terms of their pre-existing views of hypnotics. The way in which lay expertise was drawn on in responding to the coverage was one of the most striking findings of the study. People referred to their own or others' experience of taking hypnotics to recognise the legitimacy of taking them or to weigh up the risks and benefits, as reflexive users. Overall, our case study cautions against making strong claims about the power of the media to legitimate de-pharmaceuticalisation. While the media may have such a role, this is in the main only for those who are receptive to such a message already.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology | ||||||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology | ||||||||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Hypnotics -- Press coverage -- Great Britain, Hypnotics -- Side effects, Readership surveys , Drugs | ||||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Social Science and Medicine | ||||||||||
Publisher: | Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd | ||||||||||
ISSN: | 0277-9536 | ||||||||||
Official Date: | February 2017 | ||||||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||||||
Volume: | 174 | ||||||||||
Page Range: | pp. 43-52 | ||||||||||
DOI: | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.029 | ||||||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||||||||
Date of first compliant deposit: | 1 December 2016 | ||||||||||
Date of first compliant Open Access: | 22 December 2016 | ||||||||||
Funder: | Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC) | ||||||||||
Grant number: | ES/H028870/1 (ESRC) |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year