Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Prescription hypnotics in the news : a study of UK audiences

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Gabe, Jonathan, Williams, Simon J. and Coveney, Catherine (2017) Prescription hypnotics in the news : a study of UK audiences. Social Science and Medicine, 174 . pp. 43-52. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.029

[img] PDF
WRAP_1-s2.0-S0277953616306487-main.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (567Kb)
[img] PDF
WRAP_Hypnotics in the news final clean.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (481Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.029

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

In 2012 the UK media reported the results of a paper in the British Medical Journal Open, including the finding that hypnotics increase the risk of ‘premature death’. Taking this media coverage as a case study, the paper explores UK people's responses and assesses the implications for the debate about the (de)pharmaceuticalisation of sleep. Two hundred and fifty one posts to the websites of 6 UK newspapers were analysed thematically, along with 12 focus group discussions (n = 51) of newspaper coverage from one UK newspaper. Four thematic responses were identified: bad science/ journalism, Hobson's choice, risk assessment and challenging pharmaceuticalisation. We found that most people claimed that the story did not worry them, even if they stated that they were using sleeping pills, and that focus group members generally appeared to respond in terms of their pre-existing views of hypnotics. The way in which lay expertise was drawn on in responding to the coverage was one of the most striking findings of the study. People referred to their own or others' experience of taking hypnotics to recognise the legitimacy of taking them or to weigh up the risks and benefits, as reflexive users. Overall, our case study cautions against making strong claims about the power of the media to legitimate de-pharmaceuticalisation. While the media may have such a role, this is in the main only for those who are receptive to such a message already.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Hypnotics -- Press coverage -- Great Britain, Hypnotics -- Side effects, Readership surveys , Drugs
Journal or Publication Title: Social Science and Medicine
Publisher: Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
ISSN: 0277-9536
Official Date: February 2017
Dates:
DateEvent
February 2017Published
23 November 2016Available
21 November 2016Accepted
7 September 2015Submitted
Volume: 174
Page Range: pp. 43-52
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.029
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)
Grant number: ES/H028870/1 (ESRC)

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us