The Library
Quality and acceptability of measures of exercise adherence in musculoskeletal settings : a systematic review
Tools
Tools
Tools
McLean, Sionnadh, Holden, Melanie A., Potia, Tanzila, Gee, Melanie, Mallett, Ross, Bhanbhro, Sadiq, Parsons, Helen and Haywood, Kirstie L. (2017) Quality and acceptability of measures of exercise adherence in musculoskeletal settings : a systematic review. Rheumatology, 56 (3). pp. 426-438. kew422. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kew422 ISSN 1462-0324.
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kew422
Abstract
Objective
To recommend robust and relevant measures of exercise adherence for application in the musculoskeletal field.
Method
A systematic review of measures was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 sought to identify all reproducible measures used to assess exercise adherence in a musculoskeletal setting. Phase 2 identified published evidence of measurement and practical properties of identified measures. Eight databases were searched (from inception to February 2016). Study quality was assessed against the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments guidelines. Measurement quality was assessed against accepted standards.
Results
Phase 1: from 8511 records, 326 full-text articles were reviewed; 45 reproducible measures were identified. Phase 2: from 2977 records, 110 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility; 10 articles provided evidence of measurement/practical properties for just seven measures. Six were exercise adherence-specific measures; one was specific to physical activity but applied as a measure of exercise adherence. Evidence of essential measurement and practical properties was mostly limited or not available. Assessment of relevance and comprehensiveness was largely absent and there was no evidence of patient involvement during the development or evaluation of any measure.
Conclusion. The significant methodological and quality issues encountered prevent the clear recommendation of any measure; future applications should be undertaken cautiously until greater clarity of the conceptual underpinning of each measure is provided and acceptable evidence of essential measurement properties is established. Future research should seek to engage collaboratively with relevant stakeholders to ensure that exercise adherence assessment is high quality, relevant and acceptable.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Warwick Research in Nursing > Royal College of Nursing Research Institute (RCN) (- July 2017) Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Rheumatology | ||||||||
| Publisher: | Oxford University Press | ||||||||
| ISSN: | 1462-0324 | ||||||||
| Official Date: | March 2017 | ||||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||||
| Volume: | 56 | ||||||||
| Number: | 3 | ||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 426-438 | ||||||||
| Article Number: | kew422 | ||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1093/rheumatology/kew422 | ||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
