The Library
What sways people's judgment of sleep quality? A quantitative choice-making study with good and poor sleepers
Tools
Tools
Tools
Ramlee, Fatanah, Sanborn, Adam N. and Tang, Nicole K. Y. (2017) What sways people's judgment of sleep quality? A quantitative choice-making study with good and poor sleepers. Sleep, 40 (7). zsx091. doi:10.1093/sleep/zsx091 ISSN 0161-8105.
|
PDF
WRAP-what-sways-peoples-judgment-sleepers-Ramlee-2017.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (1025Kb) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-What-sways-judgement-Sanborn-2017.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1320Kb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx091
Abstract
Study objectives:
We conceptualized sleep quality judgment as a decision-making process and examined the relative importance of 17 parameters of sleep quality using a choice-based conjoint analysis.
Methods:
One hundred participants (50 good sleepers; 50 poor sleepers) were asked to choose between 2 written scenarios to answer 1 of 2 questions: “Which describes a better (or worse) night of sleep?”. Each scenario described a self-reported experience of sleep, stringing together 17 possible determinants of sleep quality that occur at different times of the day (day before, pre-sleep, during sleep, upon waking, day after). Each participant answered 48 questions. Logistic regression models were fit to their choice data.
Results:
Eleven of the 17 sleep quality parameters had a significant impact on the participants’ choices. The top 3 determinants of sleep quality were: Total sleep time, feeling refreshed (upon waking), and mood (day after). Sleep quality judgments were most influenced by factors that occur during sleep, followed by feelings and activities upon waking and the day after. There was a significant interaction between wake after sleep onset and feeling refreshed (upon waking) and between feeling refreshed (upon waking) and question type (better or worse night of sleep). Type of sleeper (good vs poor sleepers) did not significantly influence the judgments.
Conclusions:
Sleep quality judgments appear to be determined by not only what happened during sleep, but also what happened after the sleep period. Interventions that improve mood and functioning during the day may inadvertently also improve people’s self-reported evaluation of sleep quality.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine |
||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology | ||||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Sleep -- Health apsects, Well-being | ||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Sleep | ||||||||
| Publisher: | American Academy of Sleep Medicine | ||||||||
| ISSN: | 0161-8105 | ||||||||
| Official Date: | 1 July 2017 | ||||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||||
| Volume: | 40 | ||||||||
| Number: | 7 | ||||||||
| Article Number: | zsx091 | ||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1093/sleep/zsx091 | ||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 16 May 2017 | ||||||||
| Date of first compliant Open Access: | 28 June 2017 | ||||||||
| Funder: | Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC), National Institute for Health Research (Great Britain) (NIHR) | ||||||||
| Grant number: | ES/K004948/1 (ESRC), PB-PG-0213-30121 (NIHR) |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
