The Library
Deficits in category learning in older adults : rule-based versus clustering accounts
Tools
Tools
Tools
Badham, Stephen P., Sanborn, Adam N. and Maylor, Elizabeth A. (2017) Deficits in category learning in older adults : rule-based versus clustering accounts. Psychology and Aging, 32 (5). pp. 473-488. doi:10.1037/pag0000183 ISSN 0882-7974.
|
PDF
WRAP-deficits-category-older-rule-based-clustering-Maylor-2017.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1403Kb) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-deficits-category-learning-older-adults-Maylor-2017.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1018Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pag0000183
Abstract
Memory research has long been one of the key areas of investigation for cognitive aging researchers but only in the last decade or so has categorization been used to understand age differences in cognition. Categorization tasks focus more heavily on the grouping and organization of items in memory, and often on the process of learning relationships through trial and error. Categorization studies allow researchers to more accurately characterize age differences in cognition: whether older adults show declines in the way in which they represent categories with simple rules or declines in representing categories by similarity to past examples. In the current study, young and older adults participated in a set of classic category learning problems, which allowed us to distinguish between three hypotheses: (i) rule-complexity: categories were represented exclusively with rules and older adults had differential difficulty when more complex rules were required, (ii) rule-specific: categories could be represented either by rules or by similarity, and there were age deficits in using rules, and (iii) clustering: similarity was mainly used and older adults constructed a less-detailed representation by lumping more items into fewer clusters. The ordinal levels of performance across different conditions argued against rule-complexity, as older adults showed greater deficits on less complex categories. The data also provided evidence against rule-specificity, as single-dimensional rules could not explain age declines. Instead, computational modelling of the data indicated that older adults utilized fewer conceptual clusters of items in memory than did young adults.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology | |||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology | |||||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Aging -- Psychological aspects, Aging, Cognition disorders -- Age factors, Cognition disorders in old age, Learning, Cluster analysis | |||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Psychology and Aging | |||||||||
| Publisher: | American Psychological Association | |||||||||
| ISSN: | 0882-7974 | |||||||||
| Official Date: | August 2017 | |||||||||
| Dates: |
|
|||||||||
| Volume: | 32 | |||||||||
| Number: | 5 | |||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 473-488 | |||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1037/pag0000183 | |||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | |||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | |||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | |||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 16 May 2017 | |||||||||
| Date of first compliant Open Access: | 27 September 2017 | |||||||||
| RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
|||||||||
| Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
