Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Threshold adjustment of deviations from the law of one price

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Juvenal, Luciana and Taylor, Mark P.. (2008) Threshold adjustment of deviations from the law of one price. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics (Online), Vol.12 (No.3). Article 8. ISSN 1558-3708

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Taylor_Threshold_adjustment.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (464Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1520

Abstract

Using self-exciting threshold autoregressive models, we explore the validity of the law of one price (LOOP) for sixteen sectors in nine European countries. We find strong evidence of nonlinear mean reversion in deviations from the LOOP and highlight the importance of modelling the real exchange rate in a nonlinear fashion in an attempt to measure speeds of real exchange rate adjustment. Using the US dollar as a reference currency, the half-lives of sectoral real exchange rate shocks, calculated by Monte Carlo integration, imply much faster adjustment than the 'consensus' half-life estimates of three to five years. The results also imply that transaction costs vary significantly across sectors and countries.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HG Finance
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Finance Group
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Purchasing power parity -- Europe, Purchasing power parity -- Mathematical models, Monte Carlo method, Foreign exchange rates
Journal or Publication Title: Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics (Online)
Publisher: Berkeley Electronic Press
ISSN: 1558-3708
Date: 2008
Volume: Vol.12
Number: No.3
Page Range: Article 8
Identification Number: 10.2202/1558-3708.1520
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: [1] Balke, N.S. and T.B. Fomby (1997): �Threshold cointegration,�International Economic Review, 38, 627-645. [2] Clarida, R. and M.P. Taylor (2003). �Nonlinear permanent-temporary decompositions in macroeconomics and �nance,�Economic Journal, 113, C125-C139. [3] Coakley, J., R.P. Flood, A.M. Fuertes M.P. Taylor (2005): �Purchasing power parity and the theory of general relativity: the �rst tests,�Journal of International Money and Finance, 24, 293-316. [4] Dumas, B. (1992): �Dynamic equilibrium and the real exchange rate in a spatially separated world,�Review of Financial Studies, 2, 153-180. [5] Enders W. and C.W.J. Granger (1998): �Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates,� Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16, 304-312. [6] Engel, C. (2000): �Long run PPP may not hold after all,� Journal of International Economics, 57, 243-273. [7] Franses, P.H. and D. Van Dijk (2000): Non-Linear Time Series Models in Empirical Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [8] Froot, K.A. and K. Rogo¤ (1994): �Perspectives on PPP and long-run real exchange rates,�NBER Working Paper, 4952. [9] Giovannini, A. (1998): �Exchange rates and traded goods prices,�Journal of International Economics, 24, 45-68. [10] Granger, C.W.J., and T. Teräsvirtra (1993): Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [11] Hansen, B.E. (1996): �Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified�ed under the null hypothesis,�Econometrica, 64, 413-430. [12] Hansen, B.E. (1997): �Inference in TAR models,�Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 2, 1-14. [13] Heckscher, E.F. (1916): �Växelkurens grundval vid pappersmynfot,� Economisk Tidskrift, 18, 309-312. [14] Imbs, J., H. Mumtaz, M. Ravn and H. Rey (2003): �Nonlinearities and real exchange rate dynamics,�Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 639-649. [15] Imbs, J., H. Mumtaz, M. Ravn and H. Rey (2005): �PPP strikes back: aggregation and the real exchange rate,�Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 1-43. [16] Isard, P. (1977): �How far can we push the �law of one price�,� American Economic Review, 83, 473-486. [17] Kilian, L. and M.P. Taylor (2003): �Why is it so difficult to beat the random walk forecast of exchange rates?�Journal of International Economics 60, 85-107. [18] Knetter, M.M. (1994): �Did the strong dollar increase competition in US product markets?�Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 192-195. [19] Koop, G., M.H. Pesaran and S.M. Potter (1996): �Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models,�Journal of Econometrics, 74, 119-147. [20] Krugman, P. (1991): �Increasing returns and economic geography,�Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483-499. [21] Lo, M.C. and E. Zivot (2001): �Threshold cointegration and nonlinear adjustment to the law of one price,�Macroeconomic Dynamics, 5, 533-576. [22] Lothian, J.R. and M.P. Taylor (1996): �Real exchange rate behavior: the recent �oat from the perspective of the past two centuries,�Journal of Political Economy, 104, 488-509. [23] Lothian, J.R. and M.P. Taylor (1997): �Real exchange rate behavior: the problem of power and sample size,�Journal of International Money and Finance, 16, 945-54. [24] Lothian, J.R. and M.P. Taylor (2008): �How important is the Harrod-Balassa-Samuelson effect?�Economic Journal, forthcoming. [25] McCallum, J. (2005): �National borders matter: Canada-US. Regional trade patterns,�American Economic Review, 85, 615-623. [26] Michael, P., A.R. Nobay and D. Peel (1997): �Transaction costs and nonlinear adjustment in real exchange rates: an empirical investigation,� Journal of Political Economy, 105, 862-879. [27] Obstfeld, M. and K. Rogoff (2000): �The six major puzzles in international economics. Is there a common cause?� in Bernanke, B. and K. Rogoff eds., National Bureau of Economic Research Macroeconomics Annual 2000. Cambridge: NBER and MIT Press. [28] Obstfeld, M. and A.M. Taylor (1997): �Nonlinear aspects of goods-market arbitrage and adjustment: heckscher�s commodity points revisited,�Journal of Japanese and International Economics, 11, 411-479. [29] O�Connell, P.G.J. (1996): �Market frictions and real exchange rates,� Journal of International Money and Finance, 17, 71-95. [30] O�Connell, P.G.J. (1998): �The overvaluation of the purchasing power parity,�Journal of International Economics, 44, 71-95. [31] O�Connell, P.G.J. and S.-J. Wei (2002): �The bigger they are, the harder they fall: retail price differences across US cities,�Journal of International Economics, 56, 21-53. [32] Paya, I. and D.A. Peel (2006): �Temporal aggregation of an ESTAR process: some implications for purchasing power parity adjustment,� Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21, 655-668. [33] Psaradakis, Z. (2001): �Markov level shifts and the unit-root hypothesis,� Econometrics Journal, 4, 225-241. [34] Richardson, J.D. (1978): �Some empirical evidence on commodity arbitrage and the law of one price,�Journal of International Economics, 8, 341-351. [35] Rogoff, K. (1996): �The purchasing power parity puzzle,� Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 647-668. [36] Rossi, B. (2005): �Con�dence intervals for half-life deviations from purchasing power parity,�Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 23, 432-442. [37] Sarno, L., M.P. Taylor and I. Chowdhury (2002): �Non linear dynamics in deviations from the law of one price,�Journal of International Money and Finance, 23, 1-25. [38] Sercu, P., R. Uppal and C. Van Hulle (1995): �The exchange rate in the presence of transaction costs: implications for tests of purchasing power parity,�The Journal of Finance, 50, 1309-1319. [39] Taylor, A.M. (2001). �Potential pitfalls for the purchasing-power-parity puzzle? Sampling and speci�cation biases in mean-reversion tests of the law of one price,�Econometrica, 69, 473-498. [40] Taylor, M.P. (1995): �The economics of exchange rates,�Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 13-47. [41] Taylor, M.P. (2003): �Purchasing power parity, Review of International Economics, 11, 436-52. [42] Taylor, M.P., D. Peel and L. Sarno (2001). �Nonlinear mean-reversion in real exchange rates: towards a solution to the purchasing power parity puzzles,�International Economic Review, 42, 1015-1042. [43] Taylor A.M. and M.P. Taylor (2004): The purchasing power parity debate,�Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 135-158. [44] Tong, H. (1990). Nonlinear Time Series: A Dynamic System Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [45] Williams, J.C. and B.D. Wright (1991): Storage and commodity markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/885

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us