Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Taxes and employment subsidies in optimal redistribution programs

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Beaudry, Paul, Blackorby, Charles, 1937- and Szalay, Dezsö. (2007) Taxes and employment subsidies in optimal redistribution programs. Unpublished .

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Szalay_redist22.08_07.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (398Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/...

Abstract

This paper explores how to optimally set taxes and transfers when taxation authorities: (1) are uninformed about individuals’ value of time in both market and non-market activities and (2) can observe both market-income and time allocated to market employment. We show that optimal redistribution in this environment involves distorting market employment upwards for low wage individuals through decreasing wage-contingent employment subsidies, and distorting employment downwards for high wage individuals through positive and increasing marginal income tax rates. In particular, we show that whether a person is taxed or subsidized depends primarily on his wage, with the optimal program involving a cut-off wage whereby workers above the cutoff are taxed as they increase their income, while workers earning a wage below the cutoff receive an income supplement as they increase their income. Finally, we show that the optimal program transfers zero income to individuals who choose not to work.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Other > Learning and Development Centre
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Taxation, Employment subsidies
Journal or Publication Title: Unpublished
Date: 23 August 2007
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: Unpublished work
References: Armstrong, M. (1996). Multiproduct nonlinear pricing. Econometrica, 64, pp.51-76. Balestrino, A., Cigno, A. and Petini, A. (2003) Doing wonders with an egg: optimal re-distribution when households differ in market and non-market abilities. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 5, pp.479-498. Beaudry, P. and Blackorby, C. (2004). Taxes and employment subsidies in optimal redistribution programs. The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series, No.766. Besley, T. and Coate, S. (1995). The design of income maintenance programmes. The Review of Economic Studies, 62, pp.187-221. Bloomquist, N.S. (1981). A comparison of tax bases for a personal tax. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 83, pp.390-407. Boone, J. and Bovenberg, A. L. (2004). The optimal taxation of unskilled labor with job search and social assistance. Journal of Public Economics, 88, pp.2227-2258. Brett, C. (1998). Who should be on workfare? The use of work requirement as part of an optimal tax mix. Oxford Economic Papers, 50, pp.607-622. Card, D. and Robins, P.K. (1996). Do financial incentive encourage welfare recipients to work? Ottawa: Social Research and Demonstration Corporation. Choné, P. and Laroque, G. (2005). Optimal incentives for labor force participation. Journal of Public Economics, 89, pp.395-425. Choné, P. and Laroque, G. (2006). Should low skilled work be subsidized?, INSEE-CREST. Cuff, K. (2000). Optimality of workfare with heterogeneous preferences. Canadian Journal of Economics, 33, pp.149-174. Dasgupta, P., and Hammond, P. (1980). Fully progressive taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 13, pp.141-154. Diamond, P. (1980). Income taxation with fixed hours of work. Journal of Public Economics, 13, pp.101-110. Diamond, P. (1997). Optimal income taxation: an example with a u-shaped pattern of optimal marginal tax rates. American Economic Review, 88, pp.83-95. Guesnerie, R., and Roberts, K. (1987). Minimum wage legislation as a second best policy. European Economic Review, 31, pp.491-8. Grogger, J., and Karoly, L. Welfare reform: effects of a decade of change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Jullien, B. (2000). Participation constraints in adverse selection models. Journal of Economic Theory, 93, pp.1-47. Kanbur, R., Keen, M. and Tuomola, M. (1994). Optimal nonlinear income taxation and the alleviation of income-poverty. European Economic Review, 38, pp.1613-1633. Kesselman, J. (1973). A comprehensive approach to income maintenance: SWIFT. Journal of Public Economics, 2, pp.59-88. Laroque, G. (2005). Income maintenance and labor force participation. Econometrica, 73, pp.341-376. Maderner, N., and Rochet, J.-C. (1995). Is it legitimate to encourage work sharing? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, pp.621-633. Marceau, N. and Boadway, R. (1994). Minimum wage legislation and unemployment insurance as instruments for redistribution. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 96, pp.67-81. Maskin and Riley (1985). Input versus output incentive schemes. Journal of Public Economics, 28, pp.1-23. Mirrlees, J.A. (1971). An exploration of the theory of optimal taxation. The Review of Economic Studies, 38, pp.175-208. Mirrlees, J.A. (1997). Information and incentives: the economics of carrots and sticks. The Economic Journal, 107, pp.1311-1329. Moffitt, R. (2004). Welfare programs and labor supply. In: Handbook of Public Economics, vol 4, North Holland: Elsevier. Moffitt, R. (2006). Welfare work requirements with paternalistic government preferences. The Economic Journal, 116, pp.F441-F458. Rochet, J.-C. and Choné, P. (1998). Ironing, sweeping, and multidimensional screening. Econometrica, 66, pp.783-826. Saez, E. (2002). Optimal income transfer programmes: intensive versus extensive labor supply responses. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, pp.1039-73.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/89

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us