Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

No prediction error cost in reading : evidence from eye movements.

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Frisson, Steven, Harvey, David R. and Staub, Adrian (2017) No prediction error cost in reading : evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 95 . pp. 200-214. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.007 ISSN 0749-596X.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-No-prediction-error-cost-eye-movements-Harvey-2017.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (841Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.007

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Two eye movement while reading experiments address the issue of how reading of an unpredictable word is influenced by the presence of a more predictable alternative. The experiments replicate the robust effects of predictability on the probability of skipping and on early and late reading time measures. However, in both experiments, an unpredictable but plausible word was read no more slowly when another word was highly predictable (i.e., in a constraining context) than when no word was highly predictable (i.e., in a neutral context). In fact, an unpredictable word that was semantically related to the predictable alternative demonstrated facilitation in the constraining context, in relatively late eye movement measures. These results, which are consistent with Luke and Christianson’s (2016) corpus study, provide the first evidence from a controlled experimental design for the absence of a prediction error cost, and for facilitation of an unpredictable but semantically related word, during normal reading. The findings support a model of lexical predictability effects in which there is broad pre-activation of potential continuations, rather than discrete predictions of specific lexical items. Importantly, pre-activation of likely continuations does not result in processing difficulty when some other word is actually encountered.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Reading, Psychology of, Reading -- Physiological aspects, Eye -- Movements, Visual perception, Cloze procedure, Reading comprehension
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher: Academic Press
ISSN: 0749-596X
Official Date: August 2017
Dates:
DateEvent
August 2017Published
5 May 2015Available
23 April 2017Accepted
Volume: 95
Page Range: pp. 200-214
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.007
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 22 June 2017
Date of first compliant Open Access: 22 June 2017

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us