Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Post-admission outcomes of participants in the PARAMEDIC trial : a cluster randomised trial of mechanical or manual chest compressions

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Ji, Chen, Lall, Ranjit, Quinn, T., Kaye, Charlotte, Haywood, Kirstie L., Horton, Jessica, Gordon, Victoria, Deakin, C. D., Pocock, H., Carson, A., Smyth, Michael A., Rees, N., Kyee, Han, Byers, S., Brace-McDonnell, Samantha J., Gates, Simon and Perkins, Gavin D. (2017) Post-admission outcomes of participants in the PARAMEDIC trial : a cluster randomised trial of mechanical or manual chest compressions. Resuscitation, 118 . pp. 82-88. ISSN 0300-9572.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-post-admission-outcomes-participants-PARAMEDIC-trial-Perkins-2017.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (972Kb) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-supplementarymaterial-2017.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (205Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.06.02...

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Background:
The PARAMEDIC cluster randomised trial evaluated the LUCAS mechanical chest compression device, and did not find evidence that use of mechanical chest compression led to an improvement in survival at 30 days. This paper reports patient outcomes from admission to hospital to 12 months after randomisation.

Methods:
Information about hospital length of stay and intensive care management was obtained through linkage with Hospital Episode Statistics and the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre. Patients surviving to hospital discharge were approached to complete questionnaires (SF-12v2, EQ-5D, MMSE, HADS and PTSD-CL) at 90 days and 12 months. The study is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN08233942.

Results:
377 patients in the LUCAS arm and 658 patients in the manual chest compression were admitted to hospital. Hospital and intensive care length of stay were similar. Long term follow-up assessments were limited by poor response rates (53.7% at 3 months and 55.6% at 12 months). Follow-up rates were lower in those with worse neurological function. Among respondents, long term health related quality of life outcomes and emotional well-being was similar between groups. Cognitive function, measured by MMSE, was marginally lower in the LUCAS arm mean 26.9 (SD 3.7) compared to control mean 28.0 (SD 2.3), adjusted mean difference −1.5 (95% CI −2.6 to −0.4).

Conclusion:
There were no clinically important differences identified in outcomes at long term follow-up between those allocated to the mechanical chest compression compared to those receiving manual chest compression.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Clinical Trials Unit
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: Resuscitation
Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd
ISSN: 0300-9572
Official Date: September 2017
Dates:
DateEvent
September 2017Published
5 July 2017Available
26 June 2017Accepted
Volume: 118
Page Range: pp. 82-88
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 28 June 2017
Date of first compliant Open Access: 22 January 2018
Contributors:
ContributionNameContributor ID
Research GroupPARAMEDIC trial Collaborators, UNSPECIFIED

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us