Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Principles of policing and principles of punishment

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Nathan, Christopher (2016) Principles of policing and principles of punishment. Legal Theory, 22 (3-4). pp. 181-204. doi:10.1017/S1352325217000039 ISSN 1352-3252.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-principles-policing-principles-punishment-Nathan-2016.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (994Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352325217000039

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Although the debate on the basic norms of punishment is well established, the basic norms of policing have received relatively little attention. This paper connects the two subjects, defending two claims. First, it argues that some police action that is not obviously illegitimate falls under the moral standards applicable to punishment. This may strike some as surprising. The explicit job of the police does not include punishment. Such a position is customarily defended by appeal to intention, form of treatment, or expression of censure. Such appeals prove ineffective against cases that involve a discretionary decision not to prosecute, such as in the recruitment of informants or in standard public order management tactics. Second, the paper urges that this first point presents a dilemma: either police routinely act in an illegitimately extrajudicial fashion, or the stringency of the standards to which we hold criminal court procedures is, if it is grounded, not grounded directly in the fact that the courts administer punishment. Neither option is attractive.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Police -- Moral and ethical aspects, Punishment
Journal or Publication Title: Legal Theory
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 1352-3252
Official Date: 12 July 2016
Dates:
DateEvent
12 July 2016Published
30 June 2016Accepted
Volume: 22
Number: 3-4
Page Range: pp. 181-204
DOI: 10.1017/S1352325217000039
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 18 July 2017
Date of first compliant Open Access: 18 July 2017

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us