Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

When do children learn from unreliable speakers?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Robinson, Elizabeth J. and Nurmsoo, Erika. (2009) When do children learn from unreliable speakers? Cognitive Development, Vol.24 (No.1). pp. 16-22. ISSN 0885-2014

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Robinson_and_Nurmsoo_2008.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (124Kb)
[img] Microsoft Word
WRAP_Robinson_and_Nurmsoo_2008.doc
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (61Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.08.001

Abstract

Children do not necessarily disbelieve a speaker with a history of inaccuracy; they take into account reasons for errors. Three- to 5 year-olds (N = 97) aimed to identify a hidden target in collaboration with a puppet. The puppet’s history of inaccuracy arose either from false beliefs, or occurred despite his being fully informed. On a subsequent test trial, children’s realistic expectation about the target was contradicted by the puppet who was fully informed. Children were more likely to revise their belief in line with the puppet’s assertion when his previous errors were due to false beliefs. Children who explained this puppet’s prior inaccuracy in terms of false belief were more likely to believe the puppet than those who did not. As children’s understanding of the mind advances, they increasingly balance the risk of learning falsehoods from unreliable speakers against that of rejecting truths from speakers who made excusable errors.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Child psychology, Knowledge, Theory of, Uncertainty
Journal or Publication Title: Cognitive Development
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0885-2014
Date: January 2009
Volume: Vol.24
Number: No.1
Page Range: pp. 16-22
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.08.001
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: Version accepted by publisher (post-print, after peer review, before copy-editing)
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)
Grant number: RES-000-22-1847
Related URLs:
  • Publisher
References: Birch, S. A. J., Vauthier, S. A., & Bloom, P. (In press). Three- and four-year-olds spontaneously use others’ past performance to guide their learning. Cognition. Clément, F., Koenig, M., & Harris (2004). The ontogenesis of trust. Mind and Language, 19, pp. 360-379. Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59, pp. 26-37. Harris, P. L. (2007). Trust. Developmental Science, 10, pp. 135-138. Hogrefe, G., J., Wimmer, H., Perner, J. (1986). Ignorance versus false belief: A developmental lag in attribution of epistemic states. Child Development, 57, pp. 567-582. Jaswal, V. K., & Neely, L. A. (2006). Adults don’t always know best: Preschoolers use past reliability over age when learning new words. Psychological Science, 17, pp. 757-758. Koenig, M. A., Clément, F., and Harris, P. L. (2004). Trust in testimony: Children's use of true and false statements, Psychological Science, 15, pp. 694–698. Nurmsoo, E. & Robinson, E.J. (in press a). Identifying unreliable informants: Do children excuse past inaccuracy? Developmental Science. Nurmsoo, E., & Robinson, E. J. (in press b). Children’s trust in previously inaccurate informants who were well- or poorly- informed: When past errors can be excused. Child Development. Pasquini, E. S., Corriveau, K. H., Koenig, M., & Harris, P. L. (2007). Preschoolers monitor the relative accuracy of informants. Developmental Psychology, 43, pp.1216-1226. Perner, J., Leekam, S. R., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, pp. 125-137. Pillow, B. (1989). Early understanding of perception as a source of knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, pp. 116-129. Scofield, J. & Behrend, D. A. (2008). Learning words from reliable and unreliable speakers. Cognitive Development. 23, pp. 278-290. Wellman, H.M., Cross, D. & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, pp. 655-684. Wimmer, H., & Hartl., M. (1991). Against the Cartesian view of mind: Young children’s difficulty with own false beliefs. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, pp. 125-138.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/91

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us