The Library
The natural workstealing algorithm is stable
Tools
Berenbrink, Petra, Friedetzky, Thomas, 1967 and Goldberg, Leslie Ann. (2003) The natural workstealing algorithm is stable. SIAM Journal on Computing, Volume 32 (Number 5). pp. 12601279. ISSN 00975397
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S0097539701399551
Abstract
In this paper we analyze a very simple dynamic workstealing algorithm. In the workgeneration model, there are n (work) generators. A generatorallocation function is simply a function from the n generators to the n processors. We consider a fixed, but arbitrary, distribution D over generatorallocation functions. During each time step of our process, a generatorallocation function h is chosen from D, and the generators are allocated to the processors according to h. Each generator may then generate a unittime task, which it inserts into the queue of its host processor. It generates such a task independently with probability.. After the new tasks are generated, each processor removes one task from its queue and services it. For many choices of D, the workgeneration model allows the load to become arbitrarily imbalanced, even when. lambda < 1. For example, D could be the point distribution containing a single function h which allocates all of the generators to just one processor. For this choice of D, the chosen processor receives around λn units of work at each step and services one. The natural workstealing algorithm that we analyze is widely used in practical applications and works as follows. During each time step, each empty processor ( with no work to do) sends a request to a randomly selected other processor. Any nonempty processor having received at least one such request in turn decides ( again randomly) in favor of one of the requests. The number of tasks which are transferred from the nonempty processor to the empty one is determined by the socalled workstealing function f. In particular, if a processor that accepts a request has l tasks stored in its queue, then f(l) tasks are transferred to the currently empty one. A popular workstealing function is f(l) = [l/2], which transfers (roughly) half of the tasks. We analyze the longterm behavior of the system as a function of. and f. We show that the system is stable for any constant generation rate. < 1 and for a wide class of functions f. Most intuitively sensible functions are included in this class ( for example, every monotonically nondecreasing function f which satisfies 0 less than or equal to f(l) less than or equal to l/2 and f(l) = omega(1) as a function of l is included). Furthermore, we give upper bounds on the average system load ( as a function of f and n). Our proof techniques combine Lyapunov function arguments with domination arguments, which are needed to cope with dependency.
Item Type:  Journal Article  

Subjects:  Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Electronic computers. Computer science. Computer software Q Science > QA Mathematics 

Divisions:  Faculty of Science > Computer Science  
Journal or Publication Title:  SIAM Journal on Computing  
Publisher:  Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  
ISSN:  00975397  
Official Date:  2003  
Dates: 


Volume:  Volume 32  
Number:  Number 5  
Number of Pages:  20  
Page Range:  pp. 12601279  
Identification Number:  10.1137/S0097539701399551  
Status:  Peer Reviewed  
Publication Status:  Published  
Access rights to Published version:  Restricted or Subscription Access  
URI:  http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/9264 
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Actions (login required)
View Item 
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year