Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Relative per capita income levels in the United Kingdom and the United States since 1870: Reconciling time-series projections and direct-benchmark estimates

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (2003) Relative per capita income levels in the United Kingdom and the United States since 1870: Reconciling time-series projections and direct-benchmark estimates. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 63 (3). pp. 852-863. ISSN 0022-0507

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

There are currently two ways of estimating relative levels of per capita income back to the nineteenth century. The most commonly adopted approach, popularized in particular by Angus Maddison and labeled "long-span" estimates by Marianne Ward and John Devereux, is to use time-series projection from a recent benchmark.(1) The alternative procedure, labeled "direct estimates" by Ward and Devereux, is to use direct benchmark estimates for earlier years. Ward and Devereux provide some new "direct estimates" which they claim over-turn the conventional chronology of U.K./U.S. relative per capita income levels for the period 1870-1990, derived using "long-span" projections. One important purpose of this note is to dispute the new estimates, and hence to reassert the conventional chronology. Along the way, however, I wish also to make a more general methodological point about the use of time series projections and direct benchmark estimates of relative per capita income levels. In my view, it is unsatisfactory for researchers to note a large discrepancy and simply claim the superiority of one type of evidence over the other. Rather, a satisfactory account of the evolution of relative per capita incomes over a long period should be able to encompass both sorts of evidence.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
D History General and Old World
H Social Sciences
Journal or Publication Title: JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY
Publisher: CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
ISSN: 0022-0507
Date: September 2003
Volume: 63
Number: 3
Number of Pages: 12
Page Range: pp. 852-863
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/9274

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us