Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The development of counterfactual reasoning about doubly-determined events

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

McCormack, Teresa, Ho, Maggie, Gribben, Charlene, O'Connor, Eimear and Hoerl, Christoph (2018) The development of counterfactual reasoning about doubly-determined events. Cognitive Development, 45 . pp. 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.10.001 ISSN 0885-2014.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-development-counterfactual-reasoning-doubly-determined-events-Hoerl-2017.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (893Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.10.001

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Previous studies of children’s counterfactual reasoning have focused on scenarios in which a single causal event yielded an outcome. However, there are also cases in which an outcome would have occurred even in the absence of its actual cause, because of the presence of a further potential cause. In this study, 128 to 152 children aged 4–9 years reasoned counterfactually about such scenarios, in which there were ‘doubly-determined’ outcomes. The task involved dropping two metal discs down separate runways, each of which was sufficient to knock over a toy pig. One of the runways was shorter than the other, meaning that one of the discs actually knocked over the pig whereas the other always arrived too late to do so. Children were asked whether the pig would have been knocked over in the absence of the first metal disc descending the runway. We found that children could accurately answer such counterfactual questions by 6–7 years.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Counterfactuals (Logic), Reasoning (Psychology) , Reasoning in children , Cognitive styles in children
Journal or Publication Title: Cognitive Development
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0885-2014
Official Date: January 2018
Dates:
DateEvent
January 2018Published
23 October 2017Available
3 October 2017Accepted
Volume: 45
Page Range: pp. 1-9
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.10.001
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 4 October 2017
Date of first compliant Open Access: 26 October 2017

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us