Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Geostrategies, geopolitics and ontological security in the eastern neighbourhood : the European Union and the 'New Cold War'

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Browning, Christopher S. (2018) Geostrategies, geopolitics and ontological security in the eastern neighbourhood : the European Union and the 'New Cold War'. Political Geography, 62 . pp. 106-115. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.009 ISSN 0962-6298.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-geostrategies-geopolitics-ontological-eastern-neighbourhood-Browning-2017.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (800Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.009

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Recent years have seen the EU criticised for its naïve idealism, in particular in its failure to counter Russia’s increasingly assertive manoeuvres. While Russia is presented as an inherently geopolitical actor, the EU’s emphasis on a normative post-geopolitical agenda is depicted as a losing strategy. The EU, it is argued, must become ‘more geopolitical’ in what is presented as an emerging ‘new Cold War’. However, post-geopolitical depictions of the EU are problematic, but derive from an overly narrow conflation of geopolitics with modernist geopolitical practices. In contrast, the paper argues that the EU’s actions are no less impregnated with geopolitical visions aimed at ordering and organising the space beyond its borders, but also argues that the EU’s geopolitical visions – and the geostrategies adopted to implement them – are also underpinned by a need to preserve and protect the Union’s sense of ontological security. This connection between its geopolitical visions, geostrategies and sense of ontological security is important, as it means challenges to the former can generate considerable anxieties in regard to the latter; anxieties that need a response. The paper argues that the return of traditional geopolitical language can be understood in these terms, calming emerging anxieties by reaffirming a sense of order and stability in terms of an historically known set of coordinates. Although seductive, this move of (mis)recognising contemporary events in terms of historical analogy is also potentially problematic.
Introduction
Recently it has become common to depict the European Union (EU) as plagued by crisis, wracked by an apparent inability to respond effectively to a number of considerable challenges of both an internal and external nature. Internally the EU is plagued by economic woes, rising populism and a sense of democratic deficit that combined have weakened solidarity within the EU and fostered a certain amount of anti-EU sentiment. Externally the biggest challenge has come from a revanchist Russia emboldened enough to in 2014 annex Crimea and invade eastern Ukraine, in doing so precipitating a security crisis to which the EU struggled to respond (Toal 2017: 19; Youngs 2017: 5, 11). These challenges have material, organisational and political elements, but they are also profoundly ontological. They are ontological because according to EU self-narratives it should not be like this. The EU is

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Journal or Publication Title: Political Geography
Publisher: Elsevier Science Inc.
ISSN: 0962-6298
Official Date: January 2018
Dates:
DateEvent
January 2018Published
6 November 2017Available
27 October 2017Accepted
Volume: 62
Page Range: pp. 106-115
DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.009
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 31 October 2017
Date of first compliant Open Access: 6 November 2019

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us