The Library
Comment on "Properly interpreting scanning tunneling microscopy images: the Cu(100)-c(2 x 2)N surface revisited" by T.E. Wofford, S.M. York and F.M. Leibsle [Surf. Sci. 522 (2003) 47]
Tools
Tools
Tools
UNSPECIFIED (2003) Comment on "Properly interpreting scanning tunneling microscopy images: the Cu(100)-c(2 x 2)N surface revisited" by T.E. Wofford, S.M. York and F.M. Leibsle [Surf. Sci. 522 (2003) 47]. [Journal Item]
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6028(03)00400-X
Abstract
The rationale for attributing the protrusions in STM images of Cu(1 0 0)c(2 x 2)-N to Cu atoms in a symmetry-reducing adsorbate-induced surface layer rumpling is restated, and the alternative explanation by Wofford et al. is refuted. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Item Type: | Journal Item |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Q Science > QD Chemistry Q Science > QC Physics |
| Journal or Publication Title: | Surface Science |
| Publisher: | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV |
| ISSN: | 0039-6028 |
| Date: | 1 August 2003 |
| Volume: | 539 |
| Number: | 1-3 |
| Number of Pages: | 4 |
| Page Range: | pp. 182-185 |
| Publication Status: | Published |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/9448 |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
