The Library
Positional goods and the social rank hypothesis : income inequality affects online chatter about high and low status brands on Twitter
Tools
Tools
Tools
Walasek, Lukasz, Bhatia, Sudeep and Brown, G. D. A. (Gordon D. A.) (2018) Positional goods and the social rank hypothesis : income inequality affects online chatter about high and low status brands on Twitter. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28 (1). pp. 138-148. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1012
|
PDF
WRAP-positional-goods-social-rank-hypothesis-Walasek-2018.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (509Kb) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-income-inequality-affects-chatter-high-low-status-brands-Twitter-Walasek-2017.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (1297Kb) |
Official URL: http://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1012
Abstract
According to a social rank hypothesis, consumers who live in regions with higher income inequality will show greater interest in, and attention towards, positional goods and high-status brands that serve a social signaling role. We analyze millions of posts on the microblogging platform Twitter for mentions of high and low status brands. We find that luxury brands such as “Louis Vuitton” and “Rolex” are more frequently mentioned in tweets originating from U.S. states, counties and major metropolitan areas with higher levels of income inequality. In contrast, mentions of everyday brands such as “Walmart” or “Kmart” are more frequent in regions with a more equal distribution of income. Using sentiment analysis, we find higher valence (positivity) and arousal (excitement) for tweets that both mention high status brands and originate from regions with high levels of income inequality. These results corroborate the social rank hypothesis, showing that more psychological resources are allocated to positional consumption when the income gap between the rich and the poor is larger.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions | |||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science > Psychology | |||||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Income distribution -- United States, Branding (Marketing) -- United States, Twitter (Firm) -- Social aspects -- United States | |||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Consumer Psychology | |||||||||
| Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. | |||||||||
| ISSN: | 1532-7663 | |||||||||
| Official Date: | January 2018 | |||||||||
| Dates: |
|
|||||||||
| Volume: | 28 | |||||||||
| Number: | 1 | |||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 138-148 | |||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1002/jcpy.1012 | |||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | |||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | |||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access | |||||||||
| RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
