Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Not so harmless after all : the fixed-effects model

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Plümper, Thomas and Troeger, Vera (2018) Not so harmless after all : the fixed-effects model. Political Analysis . doi:10.1017/pan.2018.17 (In Press)

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-not-so-harmless-fixed-effects-Toreger-2018.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (761Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.17

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The fixed-effects estimator is biased in the presence of dynamic misspecification and omitted within variation correlated with one of the regressors. We argue and demonstrate that fixed-effects estimates can amplify the bias from dynamic misspecification and that with omitted time-invariant variables and dynamic misspecifications, the fixed-effects estimator can be more biased than the ‘naïve’ OLS model. We also demonstrate that the Hausman test does not reliably identify the least biased estimator when time-invariant and time-varying omitted variables or dynamic misspecifications exist. Accordingly, empirical researchers are ill-advised to rely on the Hausman test for model selection or use the fixed-effects model as default unless they can convincingly justify the assumption of correctly specified dynamics. Our findings caution applied researchers to not overlook the potential drawbacks of relying on the fixed-effects estimator as a default. The results presented here also call upon methodologists to study the properties of estimators in the presence of multiple model misspecifications. Our results suggest that scholars ought to devote much more attention to modeling dynamics appropriately instead of relying on a default solution before they control for potentially omitted variables with constant effects using a fixed-effects specification.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Journal or Publication Title: Political Analysis
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 1047-1987
Official Date: 4 December 2018
Dates:
DateEvent
4 December 2018Available
12 February 2018Accepted
Date of first compliant deposit: 14 February 2018
DOI: 10.1017/pan.2018.17
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: In Press
Publisher Statement: This article has been published in a revised form in Political Analysis https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.17. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology.
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us