The Library
Adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice : protocol for a qualitative systematic review examining surgeon views
Tools
Lewis, Thomas L., Furness, Hugh N., Miller, George W., Parsons, Nicholas R., Seers, Kate, Underwood, Martin and Metcalfe, Andrew J. (2018) Adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice : protocol for a qualitative systematic review examining surgeon views. BMJ Open, 8 (4). e020486. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020486 ISSN 2044-6055.
|
PDF
WRAP-adoption-novel-surgical-innovation-clinical-practice-Underwood-2018.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (953Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020486
Abstract
Introduction: Efficient adoption of clinically effective novel surgical innovations has great potential benefits for patients. Factors affecting the adoption of surgical innovation are not well understood and proposed models of adoption do not accurately correlate with historical evidence. This protocol is for a systematic review that aims to identify the qualitative evidence relating to surgeon views regarding the adoption of novel surgical innovation into clinical practice.
Methods and analysis: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance will be performed. Two independent reviewers will search the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews. Inclusion criteria are studies which report on the views of surgeons who adopt a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice. Each article will be screened for inclusion and assessed according to a Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Data will be synthesised and analysed according to thematic analysis. Given the anticipated yield of a small heterogeneous body of evidence meeting the eligibility criteria for the review, a narrative-based summary is planned.
Ethics and dissemination: This review does not require formal ethical approval as it does not involve direct patient contact or patient-identifiable data. The results of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. The results will also inform an empirical qualitative study exploring surgeon and other stakeholder views regarding the introduction of novel surgical technology and procedures into clinical practice.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | R Medicine > RD Surgery | ||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Clinical Trials Unit Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Statistics and Epidemiology Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Warwick Research in Nursing |
||||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Surgery -- Technological innovations, Surgery, Operative, Systematic reviews (Medical research) | ||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | BMJ Open | ||||||
Publisher: | BMJ | ||||||
ISSN: | 2044-6055 | ||||||
Official Date: | 17 April 2018 | ||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||
Volume: | 8 | ||||||
Number: | 4 | ||||||
Article Number: | e020486 | ||||||
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020486 | ||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||||
Date of first compliant deposit: | 13 July 2018 | ||||||
Date of first compliant Open Access: | 13 July 2018 |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year