The Library
Lithic agency, Scottish modernism, and the politics of nuclear war
Tools
Gardiner, Michael and Stones, Andrew (2020) Lithic agency, Scottish modernism, and the politics of nuclear war. Textual Practice, 34 (6). pp. 1041-1059. doi:10.1080/0950236X.2018.1533494 ISSN 0950-236X.
|
PDF
WRAP-Lithic-agency-Scottish-modernism-politics-nuclear-war-Gardiner-2018.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (358Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2018.1533494
Abstract
This paper argues that entangledness with inorganic agency, particularly that of stone, not only speaks to recent object-oriented and ecocritical thought, but also marks a constitutional division within the UK, since ‘thing power’ implies a scepticism over the organic authority of an uncodified British constitution. The agency of stone undercuts the organicism of an eighteenth century understanding of natural law that can only understand the social as an ‘evolving’ association of individual property owners, demanding an ontological ‘distance’ from objects. Lithic agency was already of concern to 1920s-’30s Scottish modernists, notably Hugh MacDiarmid, but can be traced forward to anxieties over the ‘totalising’ or ‘time-fixing’ qualities of nuclear weapons. We describe this line of agential stone from modernism to the nuclear dramas of the ‘New Cold War’ era, and how it entails an ontological shattering of the British distance from objects. Depictions of the physical violence of nuclear standoff shatter the totalisation required by British natural law, pointing to a specifically Scottish and sub-British political aesthetic. An ontological division over nuclear weapons remains central to Scottish independence campaigns today – and their release of ‘stony’ and ‘dusty’ powers beyond the human provide a ‘concrete’ example for object-oriented thinking within literary theory after its geological turn.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Divisions: | Faculty of Arts > English and Comparative Literary Studies | ||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Textual Practice | ||||||||
Publisher: | Routledge Journals | ||||||||
ISSN: | 0950-236X | ||||||||
Official Date: | 2020 | ||||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||||
Volume: | 34 | ||||||||
Number: | 6 | ||||||||
Page Range: | pp. 1041-1059 | ||||||||
DOI: | 10.1080/0950236X.2018.1533494 | ||||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||||||
Date of first compliant deposit: | 18 September 2018 | ||||||||
Date of first compliant Open Access: | 16 May 2020 | ||||||||
Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year