The Library
Science disproves the biblical account of creation : exploring the predictors of perceived conflict between science and religion among 13- to 15-year-old students in the UK
Tools
Tools
Tools
Francis, Leslie J., Astley, Jeff and McKenna, Ursula (2019) Science disproves the biblical account of creation : exploring the predictors of perceived conflict between science and religion among 13- to 15-year-old students in the UK. British Journal of Religious Education, 41 (2). pp. 188-201. doi:10.1080/01416200.2018.1540399 ISSN 0141-6200.
|
PDF
WRAP-exploring-predictors-perceived-conflict-between-science-religion-Francis-2018.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (795Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1540399
Abstract
This study drew on data provided by 11,809 13- to 15-year-old students drawn from the four nations of the United Kingdom to explore the level of agreement with the view that science disproves the biblical account of creation, and to explore the power of five sets of variables to predict individual differences in responses to that opinion. The five sets of variables were personal factors, psychological factors, religious factors, attitudinal factors (including ‘scientific fundamentalism’, understood as an exaggerated, uncritical, and unqualified belief in the inerrancy of science), and theological factors (distinguishing between differing implied theologies of religion). Blockwise multiple regression demonstrated that personal, psychological, religious, and theological factors all held significant power, but that the greatest variance was explained by the attitudinal variables. When the five sets of variables were assessed within the model, 25% of the variance was accounted for. Greater incompatibility between science and religion was associated with scientific fundamentalism (ß = .37, p < .001), with anti-religious attitude (ß = .16, p < .001), and with atheism (ß = .07, p < .001). These findings suggest that young people who believe in science in an unqualified way are more distrustful of religion.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Education Studies (2013- ) | ||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | British Journal of Religious Education | ||||||||
| Publisher: | Routledge | ||||||||
| ISSN: | 0141-6200 | ||||||||
| Official Date: | 11 February 2019 | ||||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||||
| Volume: | 41 | ||||||||
| Number: | 2 | ||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 188-201 | ||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1080/01416200.2018.1540399 | ||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
| Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in British Journal of Religious Education on 02 Nov 2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01416200.2018.1540399. | ||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 17 December 2018 | ||||||||
| Date of first compliant Open Access: | 2 May 2020 |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
