Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Should Britain leave the EU? An exploration of online argument through a Toulmin perspective

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Hammond, Michael and Charalampidi, Marina (2020) Should Britain leave the EU? An exploration of online argument through a Toulmin perspective. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 28 (1). doi:10.17471/2499-4324/1097 ISSN 2532-4632.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Should-Britain-leave-EU-exploration-Hammond-2019.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (497Kb) | Preview
[img] PDF
WRAP-Supplementary-2019.pdf - Supplemental Material
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (96Kb)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1097

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The paper shows how a framework adapted from Toulmin (1958) was valuable in exploring the force of online argument in an educational setting. In past research of online discussions there has been a focus on interaction patterns at the expense of exploring questions of content. In seeking to address this imbalance, we used Toulmin’s key terms of claim, data, warrant, rebuttal and backing in an analysis of an educational network for young learners (13-18) in which a debate on whether Britain should leave the EU was carried out. Drawing on these key terms, a framework was constructed in order to categorise messages as: claims with no force; insufficient argument; constructed argument; forceful argument. This framework was used to unpack the claims and warrants put forward in the course of the debate. The paper shows that Toulmin’s approach can be adapted to provide a feasible and useful framework for assessing the force of argument within forums. However, it is recognised that there are also challenges and limitations in using such an approach.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1603 Secondary Education. High schools
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Education Studies (2013- )
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Internet in education, Online chat groups
Journal or Publication Title: Italian Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR)
ISSN: 2532-4632
Official Date: 15 April 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
15 April 2020Published
17 April 2019Available
Volume: 28
Number: 1
DOI: 10.17471/2499-4324/1097
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 24 April 2019
Date of first compliant Open Access: 24 April 2019

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us