Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Unworking poetic address: a comparative study on Emily Dickinson, Maurice Blanchot, Paul Celan and Jean-Luc Nancy

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Ganitsky, Tania (2018) Unworking poetic address: a comparative study on Emily Dickinson, Maurice Blanchot, Paul Celan and Jean-Luc Nancy. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Theses_Ganitsky_2018.pdf - Unspecified Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (5Mb) | Preview
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b3350390~S1

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This thesis studies the element of poetic address in the work of two poets for whom address is a relational element that is connected to an awareness of finitude: Emily Dickinson and Paul Celan. Their poems privilege the idea of sending rather than saying; and focus more on addressing, challenging, and diverting yet calling the reader rather than on building meaning. This relational emphasis is also at the center of a discussion on community and literature held between Maurice Blanchot and Jean-Luc Nancy in the 1980s, which is predominantly studied from political perspectives that regard their concern with the literary as imprecise or secondary. I claim that, in their quest to think of an alternative form of community that is not based on the production of a common essence by its members, the State and institutions, they privilege and revalue literary address. By thinking about literature in the light of dying and finitude, Blanchot and Nancy stress its potential to open up relations with others at the limit of what is common, present, and representable. Their reflections thus provide an illuminating framework to help us understand the notions of address developed by both poets. Moreover, I seek to show that the differences between these two philosophers’ positions correspond to certain significant differences in the notion of address in Dickinson and Celan’s work. This allows me to develop a comparative reflection on the pairs Blanchot-Dickinson and Celan-Nancy.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Subjects: P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General) > PN0080 Criticism
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Dickinson, Emily,1830-1886 -- Criticism and interpretation, Celan, Paul -- Criticism and interpretation, Blanchot, Maurice,1930- -- Criticism and interpretation, Nancy, Jean-Luc -- Criticism and interpretation, Poetry -- History and criticism, Poetics, Community in literature
Official Date: June 2018
Dates:
DateEvent
June 2018Submitted
Institution: University of Warwick
Theses Department: Department of Philosophy
Thesis Type: PhD
Publication Status: Unpublished
Extent: 213 pages : illustrations
Language: eng

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us