Kim, Hwa Young (2018) Politics and the Limits of Philosophy: Political Realism and the Limits of the Political Realist Critique. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

Preview

PDF WRAP_Theses_Kim_2018.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1597Kb) | Preview

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This thesis will argue that political theory is a diverse field with many questions that can be asked. Because of this, the disagreement between political realism and moralism is not as stark as it may seem. There are four main sections in this thesis. The first section (chapter 1-2) will discuss the idea of a distinctively political normativity. Political realists argue that there is a normativity internal to politics, and we should not apply external moral standards to the domain of politics. I discuss the main strategies that political realists have used to establish this distinctively political normativity and show that they fail to achieve the result political realists want. The second section (chapter 3-4) develops a version of political realism and the political realist critique that does not rely on a distinctively political normativity. I argue that political realists want political theorists to theorise about politics with an ethic of responsibility. Chapter 4 applies the political realist critique to three examples of political philosophy. The third section (chapter 5-6) develops the moralist response. It is here that I show that not all political philosophy has to guide real political agents engage in political struggle directly. Chapter 5 discusses the many roles that political theory can play, and the political realist attempt to limit political theory is unsuccessful. Chapter 6 shows how even political theorists who are interested in stability do not have to theorise about politics in the way that political realists want. Finally, the last section (chapter 7) discusses how the political realist position relies on several metaethical/metaphysical claims about how our moral convictions are the product of a particular history. I argue that this scepticism is implausible because it attempts to undermine the validity of moral justification through an explanation of how we obtained our convictions.

Item Type:	Thesis or Dissertation (PhD)
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics J Political Science > JA Political science (General) J Political Science > JZ International relations
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Political realism -- Criticism and interpretation, Normativity (Ethics) -- Political aspects, Political science—Philosophy
Official Date:	August 2018
Dates:	Date Event August 2018 UNSPECIFIED
Institution:	University of Warwick
Theses Department:	Department of Politics and International Studies
Thesis Type:	PhD
Publication Status:	Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor:	Mason, Andrew ; Swift, Adam
Sponsors:	Department of Politics and International Studies
Extent:	216 leaves
Language:	eng

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads