The Library
“Precocious girls” : age of consent, class and family in late nineteenth-century England
Tools
Tools
Tools
Lammasniemi, Laura (2020) “Precocious girls” : age of consent, class and family in late nineteenth-century England. Law and History Review, 38 (1). pp. 241-266. doi:10.1017/S073824802000005X ISSN 0738-2480.
|
PDF
WRAP-precocious-girls-age-consent-class-family-late-nineteenth-century-England-Lammasniemi-2020.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (813Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S073824802000005X
Abstract
A fixed legal age of consent is used to determine when a person has the capacity to consent to sex yet in the late Victorian period the idea became a vehicle through which to address varied social concerns, from child prostitution and child sexual abuse to chastity and marriageability of working-class girls. This article argues that the Criminal Law Amendment Act (CLAA) 1885, the Act that raised the age of consent from thirteen to sixteen, and its application were driven by constructions of gender in conjunction with those of social class and working class family. The article firstly argues that CLAA 1885 and related campaigns reinforced class boundaries, and largely framed the working class family as absent, thereby, requiring the law to step in as a surrogate parent to protect the girl child. Secondly, the paper focuses on narratives emerging from the archives and argues that while narratives of capacity and protection in particular were key concepts behind reforms, the courts showed limited understanding of these terms. Instead, the courts focused on notions resistance, consent, and untrustworthiness of the victim, even when these concepts were not relevant to the proceedings due to victims' young age.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | K Law [LC] > KD England and Wales | ||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law | ||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Law and History Review | ||||||||
| Publisher: | Cambridge University Press | ||||||||
| ISSN: | 0738-2480 | ||||||||
| Official Date: | February 2020 | ||||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||||
| Volume: | 38 | ||||||||
| Number: | 1 | ||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 241-266 | ||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1017/S073824802000005X | ||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
| Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): | This article has been accepted for publication in a revised form for publication in Law and History Review. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/law-and-history-review | ||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||||||
| Copyright Holders: | © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 2020 | ||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 2 March 2020 | ||||||||
| Date of first compliant Open Access: | 2 March 2020 | ||||||||
| Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
