Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Fuel subsidies versus market power : is there a countervailing second-best optimum?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Adetutu, Morakinyo O. and Weyman-Jones, Thomas G. (2019) Fuel subsidies versus market power : is there a countervailing second-best optimum? Environmental and Resource Economics, 74 (4). pp. 1619-1646. doi:10.1007/s10640-019-00382-3 ISSN 0924-6460.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Fuel-subsidies-versus-market-power-Adetutu-2019.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1262Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00382-3

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Fuel subsidies distort end-use prices below cost, resulting in overconsumption and huge environmental cost. On the other hand, the mark-up over cost due to the exercise of market power results in the social loss of consumer surplus. We open a new line of inquiry into the potential for a market-based solution from these two countervailing forces: can the two offsetting distortions conceivably achieve a second- best optimum? Relying on dynamic panel techniques and gasoline market data for 68 developing countries, we uncover an excessive second-best subsidy offset to market power mark-up on the order of 4.5. Our results indicate that the potential for policy failure strongly exceeds the potential for market failure in our model, and gasoline prices across our sample may not be aligned with vigorous anti-climate change policy.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions: Faculty of Arts > School for Cross-faculty Studies
Faculty of Arts > School for Cross-faculty Studies > Global Sustainable Development
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Fuel trade -- Subsidies , Business enterprises -- Finance, Corporations -- Finance, Gasoline -- Prices -- Econometric models, Developing countries -- Economic conditions
Journal or Publication Title: Environmental and Resource Economics
Publisher: Springer
ISSN: 0924-6460
Official Date: 5 November 2019
Dates:
DateEvent
5 November 2019Published
21 October 2019Accepted
Volume: 74
Number: 4
Page Range: pp. 1619-1646
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-019-00382-3
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 19 May 2020
Date of first compliant Open Access: 20 May 2020

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us