
The Library
A critical evaluation of Fiedler's predictor measures of leadership effectiveness
Tools
Hosking, Dian Marie (1978) A critical evaluation of Fiedler's predictor measures of leadership effectiveness. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
|
PDF
WRAP_Theses_Hosking_1978.pdf - Unspecified Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (14Mb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b1750161~S15
Abstract
Fiedler has claimed that leadership effectiveness is a function of:
a) the type of leader (measured by LPC or ASO),
b) the type of group,
c) the type of task, and
d) the position-power of the leader.
In Part I, evidence is presented to show that LPC/ASO scores correlate with leadership effectiveness, but not in the manner required by Fiedler's theory. The conclusions reached differ from those usually presented in the literature, and are based on a detailed, systematic description of available research. It is felt that this critique constitutes a substantial theoretical contribution, worthy of publication in its own right.
In Parts II and III, the meaning of LPC/ASO is examined. Particular attention is paid to relationships between LPC/ASO and:
a) cognitive complexity;
b) perceptions of leader behaviour.
Three types of evidence are presented:
a) a critical review of existing studies (felt to be a substantial contribution to the literature);
b) correlations between LPC/ASO and independent measures of cognitive complexity (calculated for subjects with and without leadership experience);
c) an experimental investigation of perceptions of leader behaviour It is concluded that:
a) Existing interpretations of LPC/ASO are inadequate. In particular, LPC/ASO do not relate to measures of cognitive complexity used in this study.
b) LPC/ASO do not appear to reflect straightforward differences in perceptions of leader behaviour.
c) No satisfactory interpretation of LPC/ASO exists, furthermore, recent research calls into question their test-retest reliability.
d) Fiedler's theory contains severe theoretical and methodological flaws, and lacks empirical support. It is suggested that his theory be rejected, and further research concentrate on other individual-difference variables.
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor H Social Sciences > HM Sociology |
||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Contingency theory (Management), Fiedler, Fred Edward, Leadership -- Psychological aspects | ||||
Official Date: | January 1978 | ||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Institution: | University of Warwick | ||||
Theses Department: | Department of Psychology | ||||
Thesis Type: | PhD | ||||
Publication Status: | Unpublished | ||||
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: | Morley, Ian E. | ||||
Sponsors: | Engineering Industry Training Board | ||||
Extent: | [15], 299 leaves : illustrations, charts | ||||
Language: | eng |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year