Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Can the proposed British Bill of Rights and Responsibilities command greater respect than the UK Human Rights Act 1998?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Kyneswood, Natalie (2015) Can the proposed British Bill of Rights and Responsibilities command greater respect than the UK Human Rights Act 1998? Institute for Advanced Legal Studies Student Law Review, 31 (1). pp. 18-24. doi:10.14296/islr.v3i1.2246

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-can-proposed-British-Bill-Rights-Responsibilities-command-greater-respect-UK-Human-Rights-Act-1998-Kyneswood-2015.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (394Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.14296/islr.v3i1.2246

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This article discusses the UK Government’s proposals to reform human rights legislation in England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland by repealing the Human Rights Act 1998 and introducing a British Bill of Rights and Responsibilities. It discusses the reasons behind the perceived unpopularity of the Human Rights Act 1998 and concludes that an alternative British Bill of Rights and Responsibilities would be no more popular or effective and that therefore proposals for reform are misconceived. This article by Natalie Kyneswood is an edited version of the essay that won the Middle Temple Lechmere Prize, September 2015.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: J Political Science > JC Political theory
K Law [Moys] > KM Common Law, Public Law
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Human rights -- Great Britain, Great Britain. Human Rights Act 1998, Civil rights, Civil rights -- Great Britain
Journal or Publication Title: Institute for Advanced Legal Studies Student Law Review
Publisher: Institute for Advanced Legal Studies
Official Date: September 2015
Dates:
DateEvent
September 2015Published
1 September 2015Accepted
Volume: 31
Number: 1
Page Range: pp. 18-24
DOI: 10.14296/islr.v3i1.2246
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Copyright Holders: Natalie Kyneswood
Date of first compliant deposit: 13 October 2020
Date of first compliant Open Access: 14 October 2020
Open Access Version:
  • https://journals.sas.ac.uk/lawreview/art...

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us